digitalchain

Archive for 2009

Summary

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 4:36 pm

Influencing and Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (10)

The following methods will please summarize the observations about the personal influencing and fruiting presence of the Holy Spirit in our Christian life which appeared in the many articles and conversations that we have read in our pbcaa yahoogroups blog these past several weeks. These methods are the following:

  1. Through the written or oral word of God, the Bible as processed by our mind.
  2. Through God’s material creation or nature. See Psalm 19; Romans 1:18-23.
  3. Through Christian conduct which are epistles written by the Spirit. See 2 Cor. 3:1-3;1 Pet. 3:1-6.
  4. Through God’s providence. (Ed Maquiling and Reuben Emperado submitted detailed examples.)
  5. Through the assurance that God Holy Spirit included) knows our needs even before asking Him and that God is ready to respond to our petitions and supplications. See Matt. 6:8; 7:7-11; James 5:13-18.
  6. God (Holy Spirit included) chastises a disciple He loves and it is a personal God that is capable of sending reminders in the form of sickness, diseases, some failures, some accidents, etc. See Heb. 12:3-11.

Ang ating pagaaral ay ginawa sa sisteng Pinoy. Baka mas maliwanag ang Pinoy style kaysa ibang nabasa ninyo sa mga libro o magasin. Mga kapatid, salamat sa inyong partisipasyon sa blog conversations. Kung mayroon mang kahinaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid. May the good Lord bless us with good understanding of His word. We are ready to receive your observations and pagtutuwid.

Related Articles

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

The Promise in Acts 2:38 (6)

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (7)

Some Activities of the Holy Spirit in Christian Life (8)

Some human acts against the person of the Holy Spirit (9)

Some human acts against the person of the Holy Spirit

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 4:26 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (9)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences, and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

Sa mga sumusunod na talata, mababasa natin na human beings deal with a personal Holy Spirit. And if we deal with a personal Spirit and the Spirit being God, and God is everywhere, therefore, we are, some of the time, relating with a personal Holy Spirit. Christians are not always dealing with the impersonal written/oral word. Notice the following passages.

  • Men strives versus the Holy Spirit. Genesis 6:3 and James 5:4 talk about the Holy Spirit striving with men. This suggests that on the other side of the fence, humans are struggling against the will of the Holy Spirit. Genesis 6:6-7 says that the LORD (HS included) was sorry and was grieved. This is personal on the part of the Holy Spirit. Men’s striving against the Holy Spirit is what Romans 8:1-11 & Galatians 6:8 terms as “sowing in the flesh and reaping corruption.”
  • Men in the Book of Genesis didn’t merely strive or struggle with their mental knowledge God’s word. There’s an understood personal presence of the Spirit which the people disregarded. In like manner in James’ time and following generations men strive at the same level. Isaiah 63:10 says that the Israelites rebelled against God’s Holy Spirit and the Spirit turned Himself against the Israelites.
  • Men Could Lie Against the Holy Spirit. Acts 5:3-4 says that Ananias has lied to the Holy Spirit. This strongly suggests that Ananias directed his lying to a personal Holy Spirit and a personal Spirit responded with a death penalty against the culprits. Today believers who are seduced by the Devil don’t lie to the impersonal word and the impersonal word doesn’t impart physical penalty.
  • Men Could Test the Holy Spirit. Acts 5:9 says that Sapphira had tested the Holy Spirit. This reveals a relationship with a personal Holy Spirit and the penalty response is from a personal Holy Spirit. Our modern writing style doesn’t refer to any person testing the written word of God.
  • Men Could Grieve the Holy Spirit. Ephesians 4:30 says, “…do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God…” Grief is an emotion just like Genesis 6 tells of God being sorry for having created men and was grieved for their continual rebellion. King Saul’s repeated disobedience grieved the Holy Spirit that dwelt in him. King David’s adultery and murderous acts grieved the Holy Spirit but he repented and prayed that the Spirit be not taken away from him. In Isaiah’s time, the Israelites “rebelled and grieved” the Holy Spirit says Isaiah 63:10. All these cases are suggestive of dealing with a persona. We don’t speak today of grieving the written or oral word.
  • Men Could Quench the Holy Spirit. 1Thes. 5:19, “Quench not the Holy Spirit.” This reveals emotion so it means that we are relating with a personal being that has emotion and one that personally reacts. Today we don’t ever speak about believers quenching the written or oral word.
  • When the Holy Spirit empowers a teachable disciple the Spirit is victorious. Acts 6:10, “…were not able to resist the wisdom and the Spirit by which he spoke.” This, connected with Acts 6:5, suggests a personal Holy Spirit that gives courage and excellence in speech. The empowering personal Spirit is different from the speech of the disciple.
  • Men Could Resist the Holy Spirit. Acts 7:51, “…You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you.”

This suggests that men’s stubbornness or disobedience is a resistance against a personal Spirit.

  • Men Could Blaspheme the Holy Spirit. Matt. 12:312 & Mk 3:29, “…but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven men.” This is a strong suggestion that some acts of men are directed against a persona.
  • Men Could Speak Against the Holy Spirit. Matt. 12:32, “…whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come.”
  • Ananias and Sapphira Wagered with a Personal Satan. Acts 5:3. Whys is Satan a persona in this chapter but not the Holy Spirit? The Spirit was given to Ananias and Sapphira after their baptism, but the roaring lion Devil (1 Peter 5:8) doesn’t spare even those in the church. Beware because Satan could even go and make a wager in the inner sanctum of the heavens. Read Job 1 & 2.

Satan was able to lure out Judas Iscariot from among the 12 disciples of Jesus (Luke 21:3) and this is a personal Satan working. Satan could even penetrate the inner circle of our Lord. Beware! This is a personal Devil prowling around.

Jesus says, “Simon, Simon! Indeed, Satan has asked for you, that he may sift you as wheat. But I have prayed for you, that your faith should not fail; and when you have returned to Me, strengthen your brethren.” I believe that a personal Satan dared to wager with Christ Jesus. It was a special prayer of our Lord Jesus that saved Peter from total apostasy. Peter denied Jesus three times that fateful night, but he had an honest heart and a strong determination to do what is right. He bitterly cried that same night when his conscience bothered him. With the help of Christ’s prayer!

If Satan personally and tirelessly works against believers, we should consider the idea that a personal Holy Spirit is present to strengthen believers. Woe unto the person who thinks he and his mental understanding of the scriptures are sufficient protection against all the allurements of the Devil.

Yes, the Holy Scriptures are sufficient to give objective directions for right living but the flesh is subjectively weak. Just as the Law of God which was mediated by Moses was good and holy but man is the weak party. Read Romans 7. Sweet Eve promenaded with deity at the cool of day but in an unguarded moment an innocently talking seducer lured her mind, her taste buds and her stomach. She was forever trapped. King David sang all his sweetest praise psalms but his hormones overpowered his mind. King Solomon could recite his thousands of wisdom-filled proverbs and recite the best dedicatory prayers but his pride and lust swallowed him up. Judas Iscariot sat down at the feet of Jesus and drank from the pure sermon-fountains of the greatest teacher but shiny silver coins blinded him. An Apostle Peter, the primus inter pares, could proclaim his undying devotion to his Master but in a critical moment thrice denied his God and he needed a special prayer from his Teacher and a period of grace for him to mature. All of these favored people failed and needed God’s patience. I’d be most delighted to see a brother who claims to be more intellectually endowed than King Solomon, more inspired than King David, more devoted to a Master than Simon Peter or a sister who has daily walked with God in the cool of day who could claim to conquer Satan single handedly through his/her pure hermeneutics without the mediation of the Savior and intercession of the Holy Spirit.

After having presented different viewpoints on this issue I now state my position: “The Holy Spirit indwells, influences, guides the Christian today through the word of God, sometimes personally in conjunction with the word, and sometimes without the word but not contrary to the word.” The degree of influence of the Holy Spirit is dependent upon the degree of a person’s surrender to the Spirit and dependent upon the degree of possession the Holy Spirit has of the inner being of an individual.
I hope that this short article has given some clarification in our search for more light. Kung mayroong kahinaan ang
aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

The Promise in Acts 2:38 (6)

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (7)

Some Activities of the Holy Spirit in Christian Life (8)

Some Activities of the Holy Spirit in Christian Life

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 4:18 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (8)

By Eusebio Tanicala


Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences, and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

Why is the presence of the Holy Spirit in the believer’s life a gift? Sa mga Pinoy ang agimat o anting-anting ay isang kaloob. Sinong Pinoy ang ayaw tatanggap ng isang agimat upang siya ay kagaya ni General Emilio Aguinaldo or President Ferdinand Marcos or Fernando Poe, Jr. or Ramon Revilla?

Anu-anong mga maibibigay ng Espiritu Santo sa isang mananampalataya? Lalo na sa spiritual na pamumuhay? Basahin ninyo ang mga sumusunod na talata:

  • Roma 5:5– Pours out God’s love into hearts;
  • Roma 8:9; Gal. 5:22-23 – Your life radiates with the fruit of the Spirit like love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control;
  • Gal. 5:25 –Walk in the Spirit or walk on safe spiritual ground;
  • Rom 8:13 – Helps us put to death works of the flesh;
  • Rom 8:4; Gal 5:8 – Leads us in spiritual path;
  • Romans 8:16 – Bears witness to our spirit before God;
  • Roma 14:17; Eph. 5:18—Creates joy in our hearts;
  • Roma 8:26-27 –Intercedes for the believer;
  • 1 Cor. 12:7-9 – Distributes gifts of talents for ministry;
  • 1 Cor. 12:13 – Helps in our obedience in baptism;
  • Eph. 2:18—Helps us in accessing the Father;
  • Phil. 3:3 & 1 Thes. 1:5-6; Eph 5:18-19—Helps us in worship;
  • 2 Thes 2:13 & 1 Pet. 1:2 – Helps in our sanctification;
  • 2 Tim. 1:14 – Helps us guard & keep pure the sound words of God;
  • Titus 3:5 –Helps in the renewal of our life;
  • 1 Pet. 1:22 – Helps us in obeying the truth; Jude 20 – Helps us pray and build up faith;
  • Eph 3:16 –Helps strengthen with might the inner man.

Ang mga ito ay ilan lamang sa agimat na idinudulot o ipinagkakaloob ng Espiritu Santo. A successful believer who attains life eternal in heaven is “more than a conqueror.” A successful Christian life is greater than the exploits of Alexander the Great, Herod the Great, Constantine the Great, Charlemagne the Great, Gregory the Great, Charles the Great taken together.

Kung mayroong kahinaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

The Promise in Acts 2:38 (6)

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (7)

The Gift in Acts 2:38 and the Promise in Acts 2:39

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 3:56 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (7)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quexon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences, and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

Proper understanding of Acts 2:38’s “gift of the Holy Spirit” and Acts 2:39’s “promise” will greatly help us understand the presence of the Holy Spirit in the Christian’s life.

The promised pouring out and reception of the Holy Spirit among the Israelites was an anxiously awaited happening by the Jews. Why was possession of the Holy Spirit a much coveted gift? It was so because those in the OT who received the Holy Spirit, were great leaders, powerful workers, courageous fighters and outstanding artisans. Sa ating Pinoy ito ay katumbas ng agimat. Sa taga-Ilocos ito ay anting-anting. It’s a talisman and amulet. Sino ba naman ang ayaw magkaroon nito?

This Holy Spirit’s coming is both a prophecy and a promised gift from God. Please read Isaiah 11:2, Isa. 32:15;Joel 2:28-32; Zech. 12:10; Ezek. 36:27; 39:29; Luke 11:13; 24:49; John 14:16, 17, 26; John 16:7, 13; Acts 1:4-5; Acts 2:33; Acts 10:44-47 and 11:17. The promise and prophecy was not confined to the “baptismal measure.”

Reception of this pouring of the Holy Spirit in its Baptismal Measure on record was received by the Apostles in Acts 2:1-4. Other groups upon which the Holy Spirit directly descended were, first, the group in the house of prayer in Acts 4:23, 31which possibly included those who would become deacons in Acts 6:1-8; and secondly, that of Saul who later on became Apostle Paul in Acts 9:10-19 and the household of Cornelius in Acts 10:44-47.

On the other hand, those who received the Laying-on-of-Hands Measure on record are those in Acts 8:17-19 and Acts 19:6. It’s possible that others received this measure of the Holy Spirit as suggested in 1 Cor. 12 and 1 Cor. 14.

Another measure or degree of Holy Spirit presence as a gift is the Ordinary Measure. This degree is received by all who repent and are baptized into Jesus Christ. Apostle Peter declares this in Acts 2:38. Actual reception of this gift is recorded in Acts 5:322; Romans 8:11, 15; 1Cor. 6:19; Gal. 3:2; 3:14; Eph 1:13-14; Eph 2:22; 4::30; Phil. 2:1; Heb. 6:4 and James 5:4. Under the Ordinary Measure, are the charismatic gifts for administration, for teaching, strength of faith, charitable works, bountiful giving, etc. The Holy Spirit’s presence in the genuine Christian’s life serves as “seal of ownership” as well as “earnest, partial payment, down payment, guarantee, assurance of redemption.”

The baptismal measure, the laying-on-of-hands measure and the ordinary measure, are all parts of the promised pouring and coming of the Holy Spirit. There are many things that the Holy Spirit does to the obedient believer especially in the spiritual level which is why the Spirit is a spiritual agimat, a spiritual amulet which the Israelites desired.

Related Articles

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

The Promise in Acts 2:38 (6)

The Promise in Acts 2:39

In News on September 14, 2009 at 3:36 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (6)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences, and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong”indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

In reacting to the modern Pentecostalist’s claim of a continuing miraculous healing and tongue speaking, we in the Churches of Christ have produced some wrong arguments. These arguments are like the wrong arguments that have been drawn from Amos 5 and 6 in our reaction against the promoters of mechanical instruments of music in church worship saying that instruments of music were prohibited in the above passages when in fact they are not.

From the very first months I attended classes at the Bible College fifty years ago, I have heard the following arguments based on Acts 2 that the “promise” applies to the (1) Holy Spirit baptismal measure upon the 12 apostles; (2) That since the “promise is unto all flesh” the 12 apostles represented the Jewish sector while the household of Cornelius represented the Gentile sector, the fulfillment is representative; (3) That by nature a “promise” when fulfilled once it ceases to exist and since the Jews and the Gentiles were both represented in this baptism of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2 and Acts 10 this baptismal measure with its attendant miraculous powers ceased when the apostles and church leaders they laid hands on to impart the Holy Spirit died; (4) Therefore, miraculous healing and speaking in tongues have also ceased.

I believe that we have to revise our interpretation about the people or groups of people the “promise” was directed to. I believe that “promise” is not limited to the “baptismal measure” only. It is only a portion of the whole promise. The “promise” or prophecy in Joel 2:28-32 is the pouring of the Holy Spirit unto all flesh. I believe that the “unto all flesh” provision of the promise is kingdom-wide in application because of the following specifics of Joel: sons and daughters, old men, young men, menservants, maidservants, whoever calls on the name of the LORD, among the remnant whom the LORD calls. Please look at the passages again.

Acts 2:39 says, “For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.” Acts 2:33 also calls the Pentecost Day phenomenon the “promise of the Holy Spirit.” It should be logical to conclude that the “gift of the Holy Spirit” in verse 38 is the promise stated in verse 39 which the baptized believer receives. This is the Ordinary Measure of the Holy Spirit which the 3,000 baptized believers received during the Day of Pentecost. This Ordinary Measure of the Holy Spirit is part of the promised pouring out of the Holy Spirit unto all flesh.

The “representative fulfillment of the baptismal measure of the Holy Spirit” is a wrong interpretation in the light of Acts 2:39 as the fulfillment of the whole promise. If it were correct that the two incidents (12 apostles in Acts 2 and Cornelius household in Acts 10) fulfilled the whole promise, Acts 2:39 would be contradicted because the children of the audience, the people afar off, as many as the Lord God will call are all included recipients of the promise. We in the Churches of Christ interpret “afar off” in Eph. 2:13 to refer to the Ephesians and by extension Filipinos also.

The Ephesians had received the Holy Spirit because it was given to each believer as a seal of redemption (4:30); the Holy Spirit mightily strengthened the Ephesian Christians (3:16); the Holy Spirit was fruiting in the individual lives (5:9), and the Holy Spirit was personally present or else the term“grieving” Him would be a wrong expression of the inspired apostle. Acts 19:1-6 tells us of 12 Ephesians who received the Holy Spirit after Apostle Paul laid his hands on them.

I wish you a fruitful reflection on the word. More short articles to follow.Kung mayroong kahinaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tatanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles :

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces?

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (5)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Note: Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

Advocates of the “through the word only” influence of the Holy Spirit put a burden on the advocates of “personal indwelling.” Unknowingly, the seeming difficulty is a shared burden for both sides.

Let’s make a comparison and contrast table on the influencing and seducing personal work of Satan on one hand and the influencing and fruiting personal work of the Holy Spirit.

Let’s analyze 1 Peter 5:8-9, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. Resist him, steadfast in the faith, knowing that the same sufferings are experienced by your brotherhood in the world.” (NKJV)

Now we ask “thro the word only” as well as the “personal indwelling” advocates to answer the following questions:

  1. Is it possible for a personal Satan to be in 1,000 different barangays at the same one moment in time?
  2. Is it possible for a personal Satan to roar at 1,000 different individuals at the same one moment in time?
  3. Is it possible for a personal Satan to divide himself into 1,000 personal Satanitos that simultaneously go around in 1,000 different barangays and simultaneously tempt 1,000 different individuals at the same moment in time?
  4. Satan is the God of this age says 2Cor. 4:4, is he everywhere around the world at the same moment in time?
  5. When Satan roars and tempts every 1,000 individual at the same moment in time, does each individual Christian feel he is confronting a personally present Satan?
  6. Who is more omnipresent Satan or the Holy Spirit?
  7. Who is more omnipotent and omniscient the Holy Spirit or Satan?
  8. If Satan employs individual evil spirits to act for him, could not the Holy Spirit employ good angels to act for Him?
  9. Is it possible for the omnipresent and omnipotent Holy Spirit to be one person and yet make every individual believer feel that the Holy Spirit is personally dealing with him?
  10. Is it against the scriptures for the omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, immanent, transcendent God to personally attend simultaneously to the petitions of 1,000,000 believers at the same one moment in time?
  11. Since the omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, immanent, transcendent God is present everywhere, in heaven and on earth, does God’s presence both in heaven and on earth divide God into many Gods?
  12. Since the Holy Spirit is God and God is everywhere, that makes the Holy Spirit persona present both in heaven and on earth, does the Holy Spirit’s presence in several places divide the Holy Spirit persona into several persons?

I suggest that both sides should answer the above questions and that no further argumentation be made unless these are given honest answers. Have a nice day reflecting on the questions. More short articles are forthcoming. Kung mayroong kahinaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles:

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit?

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 2:56 pm

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (4)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Note: Ang temang ito ang pinagdebatehan noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin ito bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or the corporate church.

One big obstacle from accepting the personal presence of the Holy Spirit in the believer today is the possibility of contradicting the theological dogma which states, “God is indivisible.”

Personal presence would mean, to the human mind, that each Christian today would have a dwarf Holy Spirit in him. If there were 1 billion believers today then there would be one billion dwarf Holy Spirit inhabiting every believer.

To help us confront the seeming difficulty, the doubter should first answer the following:

  1. When the eternal divine nature (Godhead) of Christ dwelt/dwells in the human body of Christ, did/does the Holy Spirit became/become a dwarf Spirit reduced to the dimension of approximately 6 feet height, 2 feet width and 6 inches thickness human body size?
  2. When the Holy Spirit descended and alighted on Jesus in the form of a dove, was the Holy Spirit’s size and personal presence reduced to the body size of a human being?
  3. When the 12 apostles received the baptismal measure of the Holy Spirit, did the Holy Spirit divide Himself into 12 dwarf Spirits?
  4. Did Moses and the 70 elders in Num. 11:23-30 each possess individual dwarf Holy Spirits? (5) When the Holy Spirit descended on the household members of Cornelius in Acts 10, did the Holy Spirit divide Himself into dwarf Spirits?

Should we subject deity under the law of solid matter? One solid matter can be present at one given moment in one given place. But an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent deity could transcend time and space. A limited illustration could be television and tele-conferencing and tele-lecturing today. Today a lecturer could be in one place but can appear on big screens before big audiences in many countries simultaneously. And audiences could directly interact with the lecturer 10,000 miles away. That is the wonder of technology. And God is one billion times more wonderful than modern information technology. It should, therefore, be no worry to anyone when we talk about the Holy Spirit being present personally with every believer.

The above questions should be sincerely confronted and answered. We should confront the issue head on. What one puts as a burden on the advocate of “personal indwelling” is the same burden that the “through the word only” advocate should carry. Until these questions are answered no further argumentation should be done by those who are struggling about this issue. I wish you a peaceful day of reflection on God’s word. Kung may kanihaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles :

Personal Influencing and Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit

Personal Influencing and Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (3)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily?

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Personal Influencing and Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (3)

By Eusebio Tanicala

Note: Ang pinagdebatehan tema noong nakaraang taon sa Urdaneta City at Quezon City ay: “Resolved, that the Bible teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells, influences, and guides the Christian today only through the word of God.” Tapusin muna natin itong influence and guidance bago talakayin yaong “indwelling” kung referido ba sa individual Christian or corporate church. Gusto nating bigyang pansin itong “influences and guides” sapagkat may akusasyon na tayong nasa negative side of the proposition are “false teachers.” We have to explain our side of the issue.

Sa nakaraang sanaysay pinansin natin ang Col. 2:9. Ngayon idagdag natin ang Juan 1:14 para sa ating reflection in relation to the dwelling of the Godhead in Jesus Christ bodily. Ito ay basehan din ng ating pagmumunimuni ukol sa pananahan ng Espiritu sa buhay ng Cristiano.

“For in Him dwells the fullness of the Godhead bodily,” says Col. 2:9 (NKJV). hoti en auto katoikei pan to pleruma tis theotetos sumatikos.

The term “Godhead” says M.R.Vincent (Word Studies in the NT, 906), refers to “the essential and personal deity as belonging to Christ.” Bengel, another Greek scholar, is quoted as saying about the same word: “Not the divine attributes, but the divine nature.”

On the other hand, “bodily” means that deity is clothed with a body. (ibid.)

This description of the apostle Paul about the relationship of the personal divine nature of Christ with His human body is as mysterious as the Trinity. It’s so mind boggling when we ask the following questions:

(1) Which is larger in metric dimension, the personal divine nature of Jesus Christ or the human body of Jesus?
(2) Does the human nature of Christ encase the divine nature or vice versa?
(3) Was the divine essence of Christ personally present on earth during Christ’s earthly ministry?
(4) If the divine essence of Christ was personally present on earth during his 33 years of human existence on earth, was the presence of Christ’s deity limited to and confined within the bodily size of our Lord Jesus?
(5) During the 33 year period of Christ’s personal presence on earth, was Christ’s deity omnipresent, transcendent and immanent?
(6) Did/does the personal divine essence of Christ personally and directly dwell inside the human body of Christ?

Biblical chronology dates the Book of Colossians at 62-63 A.D. Since the verb “dwells” in Col. 2:9 is in the present tense, it is the stronger assumption that in heaven the resurrected body of Christ encases the fullness of deity. But there’s possibility that even during the earthly presence of Christ, the fullness of the Godhead dwelt in Jesus bodily. In either case, it baffles the mind how on earth can deity that is everywhere in the cosmos be encased in the human body of Jesus. It is, as previously illustrated, like someone tells you to put all the waters of Manila Bay into your coffee mug. But that is the language of Colossians 2:9. Just because we can’t explain this matter mathematically it doesn’t mean that it is false. Metrical length, width and depth should not be used to measure the omnipresence of Christ’s deity as much as we don’t use mensuration to count the Trinity and the unity of God. We should not also worry about the size of the human body whether or not it can contain a personal Holy Spirit.

We who are struggling about the presence and influence of the Holy Spirit in the Christian should answer the above questions. If these questions are fully answered, our doubts about the Holy Spirit’s presence will be lessened to a great extent.

There are more brief articles that follow this title. I hope that this is helpful. Kung may kahinaan ang aming analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Article :

The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (2)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

The Promise in Acts 2:39 (6)

Personal Influencing & Fruiting Presence of the Holy Spirit (2)

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on September 14, 2009 at 2:39 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

Gusto kong ibahagi ang aking pagmumunimuni ukol sa pagtulong ng Espiritu Santo sa mga alagad ng Panginoong Dios. Ito ay mga reflections ng isang senior citizen na dapat pagukulang pansin ng mga nakababatang mangangaral. Mayroon nang naunang mga kaisipan at katuruan ukol dito ngunit gusto kong dagdagan ang mga ito o di kaya ituwid ang ilan sa mga kurukurong ito.

Preachers and teachers among Churches of Christ love to submit Col. 2:9 as proof of Christ’s deity. And we are correct in this. But in relation to our belief in the work of the Holy Spirit we seem to deny some lines of reasoning that branch off from the verse.

If Christ’s divine nature resided/resides in Jesus’ human body, is it possible that the Holy Spirit is personally present in a Christian’s human body today? Or is it more reasonable to believe that the divine nature of Jesus resided or was/is present in Jesus’ body through the word only as processed by his human mind? Tatanggapin ng ilang mga kapatid na nanahan ang Espiritu Santo sa katawan ng Panginoong Jesus sapagkat Siya ay Anak ng Dios ngunit hindi nila matanggap na ang Espiritu ay mananahan sa isang hamak na tao lamang.  Nakakatakot ngang isipin ano?

John 1:14 is also one of our favorite verses. We believe that the Word (Christ’s name per Rev. 19:13) is a persona and that persona fused and became one with the human nature that was conceived by the Virgin Mary through the power of the Holy Spirit. And when the Holy Spirit came upon the Virgin Mary (Matt. 1:18,20; Luke 1:35) was it personally the Holy Spirit that wrought this miracle? Or was it through the word as processed/comprehended by the Virgin Mary’s mind? Even if an angel was sent to Mary, was it still the personal work of the Holy Spirit?

In discussing this personal presence of the Holy Spirit, we apply the basic assumptions in dogmatic theology which are the following: (1) There is one God and this one God is three persons in unity; (2) God is immanent at the same time transcendent– meaning God is both outside and inside the material cosmos, inside and outside of the human body; (3) God is indivisible – meaning we can’t separate and set distances among the three persons ; (4)  God—the three persons—is omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient capable of telephony, telepathy, television and teletransporting; (5) There are focalized or fruiting spots in the presence of God which means that God (Holy Spirit included) sovereignly bestows gifts and graces upon individuals as He wills; (6) When a Christian worships/prays to God it is a personal God he approaches and it is a personal God that accepts or hears and it is a personal God that responds; and (7) When God (Holy Spirit included) chastises a disciple He loves, it is a personal God that does the chastising (Heb.12:3-11) and not the word.

Sana pagmunimunihan ninyo ang mga bagay na ito. Aabot ng sampu ang gagawing serye ukol sa paksang ito. God bless all of us in our study of His word.  Kung may kahinaan ang ating analysis, handa kaming tumanggap ng inyong pagtutuwid.

Related Articles:
The Person, Mission and Medium of the Holy Spirit Viewed in Various Biblical Periods (1)

Does the fullness of the Godhead dwell in Jesus bodily? (3)

Does Holy Spirit personal presence in every believer divide the Holy Spirit? (4)

Does Satan personally influence people whom he seduces? (5)

News

In News on August 1, 2009 at 4:32 am

Binalonan, Pangasinan
This July 25th, brother Ador Casero immersed into Christ three disciples namely Rovelyn Alberto, Cindy Jane Matalang and Ferlyn Joy Aguinde.

Seminar in Musical Composition
The Philippine Bible College Alumni Association sponsors a seminar-workshop on writing lyrics and giving musical notations. This will be held in Baguio City on October 28-30. The alumni association will underwrite one third of the food and provide sleeping quarters to those who will attend. Those who have inclination and ability to write Christian lyrics, can give initial musical tone for their composition and put musical notes on the grand staff are encouraged to attend. Anyone who attends should bring at least one original lyrical poem with an initial tone which shall be submitted for the group to critique.

Thanksgiving Service
On August 5th, a thanksgiving service shall be held at the residence of brother & sister John Quiniones, Sr. at Catbangen, San Fernando City, La Union. This is in connection with the couple’s retirement from their secular jobs and will mark the beginning of more hours dedicated to evangelism. Sister Fely Quiniones has worked 32 years with the Department of Budget and Management, a government agency while brother John taught 30 years at the Union Christian College. John had been the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts at UCC upon before his retirement.
Brother John earned his Doctor of Philosophy in Education at the Saint Louis University in Baguio City.

The faculty and staff of the Rabon Bible College in Pangasinan have been invited to this occasion. Brother Eusebio Tanicala will give a brief reflection of God’s blessings before lunch is served.

A Capella Music at DWLY
Radio station DWLY which is on the FM band in Baguio City broadcasts a capella gospel music and gospel lessons every Wednesday night from 8:30 to 9:00 o’clock. Featured speaker is brother Ed Bacani and is ably assisted by Mon Devera and Dino Roldan. It is observed that the program attracts the attention of young professionals and college students.

A good number of listeners have been followed up, taught the gospel more fully and have been baptized into Christ.

Starting this August, it is hoped that another 30 minute program in this station will be added every Saturday. Listeners will be encouraged to phone in their questions and the three brethren will give answers based on the Bible #

The Original Sin of Eve (Series #3)

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on July 31, 2009 at 4:28 am

By Eusebio Tanicala

This series about original sin is related to the forthcoming discussion on “inherited” sin. I would like you to remember the original sin of the Devil that it was done with the free will of Lucifer and also done freely by his followers, that angels that rebelled.

In Series #2 we have discussed the situation of Adam and Eve before the Fall. Endowed with free will, sufficient knowledge about God, our first parents had tasted the fellowship of God in the Garden.  Both were free from any sin. In this Series #3, we discuss the original sin of Eve in the Garden of Eden.

Eve committed the first human sin. Did God decree that Eve should commit sin? No, or else God is the author of sin. Did God purpose that Eve should fall so that God could show His benevolence and be glorified for His kindness? No, or else God is the source of evil which He Himself abhors.

To this writer there are four factors that interplay in the fall of Eve. These are: (1) Eve’s possession of Free Will; (2) The presence in the Garden of Eden of this aggressive, clever, crafty, scheming, seducing enemy, the Devil; (3) God’s permission for the Devil to dialogue with Eve and present her with severe temptations; and (4) The seeming need for God to test the undivided loyalty of Eve through a temptation.

Which of these factors dominate, we are not sure. But the fact is there: Eve succumbed to the seduction and through her the first sin entered into the world. Eve reached out and picked the fruit and ate it. She gave a bite to her husband Adam. Adam seems to have readily accepted the fruit offered to him.

What could have been Eve’s emotions, longings, desires and expectations while she had the dialogue with the Devil, the Snake, at the middle of the Garden under the tree that bore the fruit that gives knowledge of good and evil? We could surmise the following: (1) Eve was aware of God’s prohibition; (2) Eve was aware of the penalty of disobedience which is death; (3) She was adventurous, daring, inquisitive and curious because she went near the tree that bore the prohibited fruit;  (4) She was a brave woman because she dared to talk to a Snake that could talk which should be an unusual occurrence; (5) Her taste buds salivated when the Devil made the fruit appear very unique and invitingly fresh and luscious; (6) Her trained eyes determined that the fruit was no different from other fruits in the garden and that it was good for food; (7) She  hasn’t experienced yet the horror or pain of death; (8) The fruit, as promised by the Snake, would give knowledge and wisdom; (9) She knew and felt she could exercise her Free Will or make her own decision; and (10) Her stomach longingly churned to receive the invitingly fresh and luscious fruit.

All the major longings and desires of humanity were there in Eve: adventure and curiosity, wisdom, tinker with what is beautiful, satisfaction of the appetite, going up to the highest level of knowledge and wisdom because she was assured by the Devil she would be  as wise as God, attached to a high level of wisdom is authority and power, was assured that the penalty of death was not forthcoming, and she felt her freedom – she could exercise her own choice.

All these items were sufficient in Eve’s time to make her decide and act. If present today in any situation, an individual would easily succumb to any invitation offered by the Devil. On the other hand if Eve were left alone, she could have reflected on the warnings given by God and debated herself. But there was the mesmerizing, hypnotizing and seductive suggestions pouring out from the mouth of the Devil that drowned any reflections she wanted to make about her relationship with God. She was under the spell of Satan.

What could have been the push, pull or pressure that the Devil exerted on the emotion and mind of Eve? The following are possible: (1) Based on narratives today, when a human comes under the spell of a spirit, the human mind comes into stupor or trance and suggestions are easily accepted – one is hypnotized; (2) Having been an archangel with great knowledge and experience in the art of seduction, the Devil had an undue advantage over an innocent, inexperienced young woman;  (3) Brought up in the innocence and purity of the Garden of Eden, Eve tended to believe every new idea she heard; (4) The titillating appearance of a good looking, luscious fruit was hard to resist; (5) She was possibly hungry at the time she went out so there was the intense pleasure evoked by expectation of swallowing the luscious fruit, (6) Being a veteran of the art of seduction, the Devil inveigled the young, innocent woman with empty assurances;  (7) the promise of attaining a high level of wisdom which would equal that of God’s was so irresistible; (8) The assurance that death was not coming, and she didn’t know anything about death, Eve became more adventurous; and (9) the intense, immediate pleasure in the flesh evoked by the senses of sight, taste buds, churning stomach overpowered the less intense delight of spiritual joys among the young and inexperienced.

Delights of the flesh are intense, overpowering and are immediately felt. Among the innocent and the inexperienced, fleshly delights could easily drown the distant delights of a heavenly paradise.

It is only when a person reaches old age that she would learn to prefer spiritual joys to the pleasures of the flesh. After many years of struggle a person comes to learn that fleshly delights are only fleeting. Some delightful experiences may even lead to body pains. Eve was young and inexperienced when she was confronted by the Devil. Being young and inexperienced the pleasure of the flesh was stronger than the delights of spiritual things. Sometimes hindsight is better than foresight.  #

(Note: Series #4 will discuss the Federal Theory of passing on to the next generation the Sin of Adam. This is called Inherited Sin. Parents from the time of Adam and Eve, according to this Federal Theory, automatically pass on a certain kind of sin to their children. A sin which even the precious blood of our Lord Jesus Christ could not wash, could not remit, could not blot, could not expiate, could not cover. A sin that God could not forget and forgive until every human being shall have gone to hell or to heaven.)

Adam and Eve before the Fall (Series #2)

In Features, Views on July 23, 2009 at 4:24 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

Eve was the first human to commit sin. Did God decree or predestine Eve to commit sin and be separated from God? Is it the Devil to be blamed in Eve’s committing the first sin? Or is the blame entirely on Eve’s?

Let’s analyze the situation of Eve before she committed the original human sin.

The material that God gathered with which He started to form man was dust or clay from the ground. The clay lump was lifeless. Then God breathed into the lifeless lump of clay and Adam became a living soul. See Genesis 2:7. Earlier God said, “Let us make man in our image.”  This means that Adam’s biological life as well as his spiritual Self were derived from God. In that principle or entity that God breathed into Adam’s nostril is the image of God in man.

What is the image of God that Adam and Eve took after God? Not the material dust which turned into flesh and bones. Obviously God’s image in Adam is that part that animated the lifeless lump of clay. It is the soul and the spirit or the soul-spirit which sometimes is called the inner man. James 2:26 says that when the spirit gets out of the body, the body becomes dead.

Therefore, it is clear that the soul-body entity is a personality as complete as any of the angelic individuals that were earlier created as recorded in Colossians 1:16-17. This soul-spirit entity has life as God has life. In addition, this soul-spirit entity gave Adam and Eve emotion, will, self-consciousness and reason. Emotion, will, self-consciousness and reason are also present with God. This spiritual aspect of man is the image of God in humanity.

This soul-spirit, the inner man in Adam and Eve’s personality possessed the following from the moment of creation: no sin, innocently holy, a knowledge of God, no knowledge of evil, no malice, heard God’s positive instruction permitting them that all fruits in the garden were for food, heard God’s instruction that the fruit of the tree at the middle of the garden which gives knowledge of good and evil should NOT be eaten, heard the warning that if they would eat the fruit of that tree at the middle of the garden they would surely die, enjoyed the frequent visits of God in the garden at the cool of day, they could exercise free will or self-decision, husband-wife relationship was God-given and blessed, animals were their playmates and friends, they were told to tend the garden without hard labor, food was easily available from the fruits of the trees, availability of the fruit of the tree of life, soul-spirit life was clean and nourished by God’s grace, soul-spirit personality directly connected to God’s life-sustaining grace like a fetus that is nourished thro the umbilical cord of the mother, and the soul-spirit entity enjoyed its close fellowship with God, the father of all spirits.

Life in the Garden of Eden, therefore, was blissful, easy, pure, holy, innocent, shielded by God’s grace and love.

How many days, how many months or how many years did Adam and Eve live in the garden in blissful innocence? There’s no biblical information on this matter.

(Note: The third series will analyze the motivations that pushed Eve to reach out to the fruit as well as the external factors that pushed her into the precipice.)

The Original Sin of Lucifer (Series #1)

In Features, Views on July 22, 2009 at 4:24 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

The original sin was not committed by Eve in the Garden of Eden. It was Lucifer who committed the original sin, the very first sin. Let’s prove this proposition.

Create a timeline. From past eternity all that existed was God. There was a period when all that was, all that existed was God. This deity we are talking about is the Trinity: three persons called God. They are the Father (1st Person), the Word (2nd Person, also called the Son, Jesus, Christ), and the Holy Spirit (3rd Person).

Then came a moment later when God created the Invisible Universe; this happened before the creation that took place in Genesis 1:1. This is the account of the creation of the invisible, non-material universe: “For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.” (Col. 1:16-17) The Creator pointed to here, the pronouns in the two verses, refer to Christ, the Second Person in the Trinity. He was a persona before Genesis 1:1 and before His incarnation.

Part of the invisible, non-material creation accomplished by Christ is described in Eph. 6:12: “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”

Part of this invisible, non-material creation is the spiritual hosts or angelic hosts. Angelic hosts or angels have personalities. There are the archangels like Archangel Michael, Archangel Gabriel. There are the cherubs and the seraphs. It is believed that one of the archangels was Lucifer. These archangels were assigned thrones or positions of authority and were assigned their own respective spheres or dominions. These angelic hosts, or the angels were created with fully developed understanding with high level of knowledge. Upon creation they were matured with at least, by rough estimation and comparison, the level of a doctoral degree knowledge. So they were expected to know their responsibilities and know what’s good and bad. This fully developed knowledge is inferred from 2 Peter 2:11, “Whereas angels, who are greater in power and might, do not bring a reviling accusation against them before the Lord.” Angels, compared to humans, have higher or greater power and might, greater knowledge, greater ability, greater authority, greater strength than humans.

Archangel Lucifer was on his throne, in his own dominion with his angelic host of millions or billions in number. Having been created by God, naturally Lucifer should have recognized his inferiority to the Creator. Lower in rank, lower in ability, lower in strength, lower in knowledge, lower in authority. But he had an ambition: to be equal with God or even higher than God. Read Isaiah chapter 13 and chapter 14:1-27. Strong inference is derived from Isaiah 14:12-14 “….. O Lucifer, son of the morning! ….. For you have said in your heart: ‘I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God? I will also sit on the mount of the congregation on the farthest sides of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High!’” (NKJV)

Lucifer’s ambition recorded in Isaiah is reflected in the ambition of the King of Babylon.

Analyze the inference gleaned from the following passage.

“Because your heart is lifted up, and you say ‘I am a god, I sit in the seat of gods’ . . . . . with your wisdom and your understanding you have gained riches for yourself . . . . . you were the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering: the sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, turquoise, and emerald with gold…..was prepared for you on the day you were created. You were the anointed cherub who covers; I established you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked back and forth in the midst of fiery stones. You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created, till iniquity was found in you.” Ezekiel 28:2-15

The ambition of Lucifer as recorded by Ezekiel is mirrored in the ambition of the king of Tyre.

Human beings that are influenced by the Devil reflect the ability of the Devil as recorded in 2 Peter 2:10 with the following acts: despise authority, presumptuous, self-willed not afraid to speak evil of dignitaries. Jude 4, 7, 8, 10 record characteristics of the Evil One as reflected by people that the Devil influences on earth: deny God and the Lord Jesus Christ, went beyond limits of morality, wild imaginations, reject authority, speak evil of dignitaries, speak evil of what they don’t know.

From the above we infer that Lucifer went beyond the limit, went beyond the boundary defined by God for him. This is the same conclusion we find in Jude 6: “And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own habitation…”

John 8:44 says, “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in Him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.” Jesus addressed here the Jewish leaders and unbelievers. These people reflect the attributes of the Devil.

From inference, the Devil reviled God and his fellow archangels. He despised God’s authority, was self-willed and wanted to be equal with God or even higher than God. These were his sins. These were the very first sins ever committed.

Conclusion

Lucifer was created a perfect, beautiful and a holy angel. God set limits and boundary for him. But he was self-willed and didn’t follow God’s will. He had ambitions to be equal or even higher than God. He failed to honor God’s dignity and authority. He reviled and despised God. In doing so, Lucifer exercised his will. He made decisions arising entirely from his will. It was his own choice. But God is a God of justice. God pronounced a penalty for Lucifer and his followers: God consigned them into the darkness of Tartarus.

Did God will and predestine Lucifer to commit sin? No. God could not be the author of rebellion against Himself. God is not the author of sin. Lucifer in opposing God became Satan. Satan (Hebrew term) means “Adversary” “Contrabida” “Opposer” The word “Devil (Greek term) means the same thing Adversary, Contrabida, Opposer.

The lower angels that followed or supported Lucifer in his rebellion also possessed will, the power to choose what they want to do or to have. Originally they were holy and advanced in knowledge. They had the freedom of choice. But they were responsible for their own actions. For their rebellion, they were consigned to the darkness of Tartarus.

Evaluative questions

Who willed that Lucifer committed rebellion against God? Who willed that Lucifer should become the Devil? Is there any decree of God that predestined Lucifer to become God’s Adversary? Whose fault is it that Lucifer committed the original sin? #

(Note: The next article will analyze the pre-fall attributes and the motivations of Eve).

Baptisms

In News on June 24, 2009 at 3:15 pm

Dear Brothers,

Greetings!!!

Sharing Some News:

Five young men baptized this afternoon, Jolland Alfaro-14; Gerald Bonifacio-17; Jefferson Garcia Alfaro-16; John Wynn Vidal-16; and Genesis “Genz” Sabino-16 (see photos). All of these kids are studying WBS lessons, invited to attend the WBS-Aklan Misson Workshop. This is the second workshop they have attended; after a lecture on “Family of God” series they decided to be baptized for the forgiveness of their sins. There are six people already were immersed into Christ this year with connection to World Bible School lessons.

Special thanks to JV brethren through Bro Brian Bishop and the WBS family in Baguio City for sending materials, flyers, booklets, promo paraphernalia, song books etc, which make our seed sowing easier and harvesting good for the Lord…“being confident of this very thing, that He who has begun a good work in you will complete it until the day of Jesus Christ…” (Phil 1:6)

WBS-Aklan Mission Workshop shall continue on the first week of August in time with the celebration of congregation’s 8th year existence in Kalibo Aklan.

Big Forex box sent from JV Houston Texas through the Bishops has arrived Friday, June 19. Thank Brothers for many good things you have been sharing us.

This is all for now Brothers. Warmest regards and God bless y’all.

In His Service,

Sammy and Janel Sinco
Cellphone: 09195164057
Email: spsinco@yahoo.com

News from around the archipelago

In News on May 3, 2009 at 4:14 pm

222 LADIES IN BACOLOD CITY RETREAT

Two hundred twenty two ladies from 21 congregations were registered in the April 28-May 1 National Ladies Retreat in Bacolod City, Negros Occidental. There were 7 participants from the United States and one from Singapore.

Next year, this annual affair for the ladies of Churches of Christ will be held in Baguio City. The A-Hill Church in Baguio will play host.

CHURCH LEADERS’ FORUM

May 30 has been set as Church Leaders’ Forum for Cavite congregations which will be conducted at the Church Planting Institute building at 28 San Jose Road, Dasmarinas.

BIBLE COLLEGE & SCHOOL OF PREACHING TEACHERS’ FELLOWSHIP

The Philippine Bible College Alumni Association Board of Trustees has marked May 28-30 on the calendar for a seminar-fellowship for teachers.

Those invited are Bible College & School of Preaching teachers in Luzon who are alumni of Philippine Bible College. There will be an exchange of information about curriculum, admission policies, grading system and school mission/vision. Brother Mon Devera will lecture on the benefits and demonstrate the advantages of using computer technology in classroom teaching and study.

Invited are PBC alumni teachers who are in the following schools: Rabon Bible College, Philippine Theological College, Central Luzon School of Preaching, Philippine International Bible Institute (branches in Angeles City, Olongapo City, Batangas and Naga City), Manila School of Evangelism, Philippine Bible College (Solano) and Philippine Bible College in Baguio.

YOUTH OVERNIGHT FELLOWSHIP

Fifty young people from eight Cavite congregations had an overnight fellowship at the church building located in San Jose, Dasmarinas, Cavite last May 1.

Persecution and Endurance

In Features, Views on April 23, 2009 at 4:16 pm

By Dr. Hans Grimm

(Editor’s Note: This article was published in the WordMinistry paper edition in August 2006. It was reprinted from the The Voice of Truth International which was then edited by J.C.Choate. Please read this article in relation to the article “Continuity or Restoration?” and make your own conclusion.)

May I speak of myself as a connecting link of the Central European churches of Christ and the brethren and sisters of the English-speaking restoration movement? Hitler’s henchmen in World War II tried to complete the destruction of the Lord’s little flock. In 1933 all bishops and deacons of the churches of Christ on German soil were imprisoned in Konzentra-tion-slager. In 1939 the adult members in East Prussia followed their shepherds into the prisons and hard-labor convoys, where they perished in 1944, and in 1942 the 11 Allssatian families were deported to Poland. There they were massacred by the advancing Red tankists in January 1945. All died with the same heroism for their Lord as their ancestors did.

I was born in 1899 at Sablon-lez-Metz as a scion of one of the oldest Christian families between the Mosele and the Alps. My dear father was one of the last three bishops of the church of Christ in Strassburg, and I was immersed by my uncle in the icy waters of the Hnauer Wiher March 18,1916. Trained in Strassburg, Konisberg, and Hamburg Universities, I obtained a license in comparative history of religions. Imprisoned in 1933 by the Nazis for preaching the gospel in the face of a blasphemous government, I had to suffer almost two years in the concentration camps of Mammerstein and Lichtenburg, hunger, thirst and the uninterrupted thrashing of arms, shinbones and head, like all other political, religious or non-Aryan prisoners. Released, deaf in one ear and with crushed kidneys, I continued preaching like my ancestors in woods, hills and swamps or in hiding places in the large cities. I had to sell my special library and furniture to manage to live. When World War II began, I was commissioned as an interpreter with the army.

Back in Leipzig on Christmas, 1945, I learned of my dear father’s death, and from some survivors, the extermination of our churches in East Europe. I immediately toop up the task of rebuilding the destroyed brotherhood, and I had to work hard as a proofreader, reporter, and lecturer to earn a living not only for me, but also for the old and sick brethren and sisters in Communist-ruled, famine-stricken and ravaged East Germany. I could say with the apostle, “These hands have ministered unto my necessities, and to them that were with me” (Acts 20:34).
Just at the beginning of a remarkable revival of young people in Leipzig, and three months after my wedding, I was arrested October 9, 1948, by the Communists and for four years imprisoned in the ill-famed jails of Leipzig, Waldheim and Graefentonna. The pretended reasons: conspiracy against the Red government in religious circles.

Released in the fall of 1952, I joined my dear wife in Western Germany. In March 1953, the Protestant State of Kurhessen-Waldeck invited me to take over the office of president of the Evangelical Academy for Social Ethics in Kassel. I declined; I could not subscribe to the promise not to attack the teaching of the Confession of Augsburg.

But in the same month I met for the first time in my life a member of the restored churches of Christ of America. What he had to tell me was not other than the faith of my ancestors which I had taught and practiced all my life. My grandfather had had contacts with the Scottish (Haldane) Baptists and Sandemanians, yea, even with Christadelphians in Birmingham, but the American Restoration Movement had been totally unknown to us. And now the fact that the Lord had built up his church beyond the Atlantic, just in time, when his last followers in Europe dwindled, hit me like a thunderclap. The torch did not die out! God had kindled it again and put it on a lamp stand and it gives light for everybody in the house. This was the fulfillment of Christ’s promise: I am going to build my church, and the powers of death will never prevail against it.

Continuity or Restoration?

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on April 23, 2009 at 4:08 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala, Ph.D.

Among us in the Churches of Christ, there are three points of view about the history of the church. These are (1) Uninterrupted continuity from the first century to the present; (2) A complete falling away or complete apostasy and a re-emergence on American soil historically related to the Stone- Campbell Movement, (3) A complete falling away or complete apostasy of people but the church existed in the seed, the word of God.

Let’s explain and analyze the three points of view.

A. Uninterrupted Continuity

Muslims, the INC-1914, and the Church of Christ of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons) believe in the complete apostasy of the church that the Lord Jesus established in the first century. Muslims believe that God sent Muhammad as the last prophet in the 6th century. The INC-1914 preachers, on the other hand, believe in the apostasy of the first century church hence the re-emergence of the Iglesia ni Cristo in 1914 with Mr. Felix Manalo as God’s last messenger. Mormons also believe that the Church of Christ in the first century fell away so there’s a need for a new prophet – Joseph Smith.

Filipino apologists of Churches of Christ generally take the uninterrupted continuity of the church that Christ built but are hard pressed to produce historical records. One time this writer in a gospel meeting open forum was challenged to produce historical records or documents to prove the uninterrupted flow of Churches of Christ believers. Or show documents when Eusebio Tanicala was baptized, when my baptizer was baptized, and so on back to one of the apostles of the New Testament. In turning the table on the INC-1914 preacher, I countered, “Mr. RZ, I want you to produce historical records or birth certificates that you descended from Adam and Eve or else I will proclaim that you descended from monkeys.” The poor interrogator stopped asking questions.

Passages that we use to support this “uninterrupted continuity” are Daniel 2:44; Daniel 4:3; Daniel 4:34; Daniel 6:26: Daniel 7:14: Luke 1:33; Matthew 16:18; Romans 11:2-6; Ephesians 5:22-33; 1 Tim. 4:4; Hebrew 12:28; Revelation 12:4-6.

In submitting the above passages we understand that God would preserve a portion or a remnant of the faithful in all ages. If God promised to preserve and if He didn’t preserve the remnant, then God is a liar. But God cannot lie says Titus 1:2. Because God promised to preserve a remnant, we have to accept that item by faith. To demand a historical and evidentiary document is to show disbelief in the promise of God.

B. Complete Apostasy and Re-emergence on American Soil

Many American members of the Churches of Christ are inclined to this concept of apostasy and re-emergence of the Church via the American Restoration Movement. This group is confused because while they believe in complete apostasy yet it points to some historical markers in Massachusetts that some Puritan groups had congregations in the 1600s called “Church of Christ” who they also claim to be part of the Churches of Christ. But these congregations in the 1600s in the English colonies antedated the arrival of Alexander Campbell in September 1809 in New York. Tom Mapalo submitted to our blog a short article (from the Iloco magazine Bagnos of the 1970s) a historical document regarding this Massachusetts Puritan Church of Christ). This writer was the one who put that in the Iloco magazine which was a cover picture/caption of the magazine Firm Foundation. Dino A. Roldan has also submitted historical documents in our blog that prove that there were other groups outside the movement that sprang up from the preaching of Barton W. Stone as well as from the work of Thomas & Alexander Campbell. You could also check up the biography of Alexander Campbell and you’ll find that when he visited Scotland after moving to America in 1809, there were Churches of the same persuasion as he had. Which means that Alexander’s movement in America was not a “re-emergence of the church” from apostasy. They planted the seed in their hearts. They believed, obeyed, and practiced commandments and ordinances that Christ gave in the New Testament. These Americans became members of local congregations as were obedient people in Europe were members of local congregations of the universal church. Many continental Europeans continued on faithfully. Many people in Great Britain stayed close to the NT teachings so they were considered members of the universal church of Christ.

Some American church members believe in the story of Dr. Hans Grimm. (See the article under another title.) Dr. Hans Grimm who came from Central Europe says that his clan were members of a group that are nearly identical in beliefs and practices with those in the American Restoration Movement.

In view of the above observations the “re-emergence/restoration” view of some American brethren is not consistent. It should therefore be dropped.

C. The Church Exists in the Seed, the Word of God

Several American tract writers state that the church continues to exist as long as the seed, the word of God exists. They say that even if all disciples died as long as the seed, the gospel, the Bible does not disappear, the church is said to be existing. That when the seed, the gospel is preached in any century in any locality it produces the same church or disciples as was produced in the first century.

This explanation is, however, not persuasive. First, we define “church” as called out PEOPLE from the darkness of sin into the kingdom of Christ. So church is people. The seed, the Bible, is NOT church. Your Bible is not a church. An evangelistic sermon is not a church. The thousands of Bibles printed by the Philippine Bible Society stored in bodegas displayed in many bookstores are not thousand churches of Christ.

When we talk about the continuous existence of mango trees in the Philippines, we talk about TREES with roots, trunks, branches, twigs and leaves. Any Pinoy who insists that mango trees never stopped growing in the Philippines since it was first brought in and then argues regarding the presence of seeds as the same as the existence of mango trees is not a believable agriculture historian. A mango seed is NOT a mango tree.

I hope that this article is of help to our young preachers and church leaders.

Bacteria: Friend or Foe

In Views on April 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm

Most of us probably have negative thoughts when we think about bacteria. We know that diseases are caused by bacteria, and we have been told since childhood that we need to wash our hands to avoid illness. Most of us know that from the seventeenth through the nineteenth centuries a fourth of all women giving birth in hospitals died of puerperal fever which was an infection spread by unhygienic nurses and doctors. What we may not know is that there was strong social opposition to hand washing during that time. In 1843 Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. campaigned for basic sanitation in hospitals, but was opposed by most of the medical establishment. Dr. Charles Meigs who was a famous American obstetrician responded that “Doctors are gentlemen, and gentlemen’s hands are clean.”

Read more…

Question on Amos 5:23

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on April 17, 2009 at 3:00 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

Last April 10, I gave a lecture to a large crowd in Baguio City during the “Panagkakadua” (Fellowship) of Northern Luzon congregations. I insisted that Amos 5:21-24 does not prohibit the use of instrumental music in worship. I also told the brethren that Jack P. Lewis, a member of the Churches of Christ, and a well known scholar in the Old Testament, says that Amos 5 proves nothing about the use or non-use of instrumental music in worship.

During the open forum, a slip of paper was given to me with this question: “If Amos 5:23 is not a prohibition on the use of instruments of music, what does “I will not hear the melody of your stringed instruments mean?” The tone of the question was “is it not a prohibition?” I answered the question during the forum.

To my brethren and especially members of the PBC alumni association, please open your Bible to Amos 5:23. Please open your eyes and your mind. What is the first part of v. 23? It says, “Take away from Me the noise of your songs.” If v. 23 prohibits the use of stringed instruments, should not singing also be prohibited? But why do you sing in your worship time? Why do you sing in your birthday celebrations? Why do you sing during funeral services? Why apply prohibition on the second part of the verse but not in the first part of the verse. Come on, be true to yourself.

I repeat, Amos 5:21-23 is not talking about prohibition. I told the Baguio audience that the non-acceptance of the items enumerated is the employment of a figure of speech called “litotes” which means “relative negation.” This is the explanation of 1 Corinthians 1:17. Apostle Paul said that “he was not sent to baptize but to preach the gospel.” The Apostle Paul did not consider the non-essentiality of the act of baptism. He didn’t eliminate the command to baptize. He employed “litotes” which directs one to put to the side or reduce something and put to the center or magnify another which is more important.

In the case of the Corinthians, the converts were boasting and magnifying the names of the people who baptized them. As if their salvation were attached to the merits and popularity of the baptizers. So Apostle Paul “relatively negated” or put aside or reduced the importance of the baptizers so that he could put to the center or magnify the gospel of Christ (death, burial, resurrection) as the important thing in salvation. Which is why in another section of his letter to the Corinthians, the apostle Paul said, “I determine to know nothing except the cross of Christ.”

Please read Isaiah chapter 1 and Matthew chapter 23. The prophet Isaiah employed relative negation. So did our Lord Jesus.

The Israelites of Amos’ day were not accepted in their observance of their religious activities that were commanded through Moses because the people of Israel did not practice justice and righteousness (v.24). If justice and righteousness were practiced, then their religious duties could have been acceptable. Tithing the mint and anise and cumin could have been accepted among the Jews if the Jews practiced justice and mercy and faith. Wherefore Christ said, “These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone.” (v. 23). Christ demands a balanced or a complete observance of all His commandments and all of our Christian duties.

News bits

In Baptisms, News on April 17, 2009 at 2:34 pm

8 Baptisms in Olongapo City
From Olongapo City, brother Higato Tulan, Sr. reports that eight souls were taught and were immersed into the death of the Lord Jesus last April 10 during the annual Central Luzon Family Bible Encampment.

11 Baptized in Baguio City

During the April 8-10 Baguio fellowship of Northern Luzon congregations, a special class for “seekers” was conducted for friends and relatives of church members who have started studying the Bible. Encouraged by the special lessons presented to them and other lessons in the plenary sessions, eleven young people were baptized.

22 Baptized During the Metrowide Youth Camp

Brother Randy Macapagal of the Kalookan City congregation that meets at Morning Breeze Subdivision reports that twenty two young people obeyed the gospel of Christ during the April 7-11 Metrowide Youth Camp held in Nozagaray, Bulacan. Young people from congregations in the MetroManila area, Batangas and Cavite were greatly blessed by the lessons and experiences in this outdoor affair which is arranged by church leaders of the said area.

28 Attends Training in Ilocos Norte

In a text message sent in by brother Abel Mariano of Laoag City, he tells us of a preachers training held April 9-10 in Dingras, Ilocos Norte. There were twenty eight in attendance.

SOME LESSONS OLD MEN LEARN

In News on April 16, 2009 at 6:45 am

There comes a time in the life of a person when he must concede that he is getting old. While old is not the most desirable state, it beats the alternative by a mile. In fact there are some benefits that come with advanced age. Most people have learned many valuable lessons in their lifetime and have profited thereby. The same should be true of those who preach:

* In old age, you finally recognize and admit your limitations. You can’t do everything, you cannot master every aspect of knowledge. You will not always hit a home run when you preach.

* You learn and accept that there are others who are smarter and more gifted than you. Some of them are young!

* You are more patient with the young, the immature and the ignorant.

* You are much more selective in choosing your battles. If one must do battle for the Cause of Christ, he should choose an issue worthy of the occasion.

* You learn that the church that Christ built has both a divine and a human dimension. That human aspect will never be perfect. This you must accept if you are going to serve and survive as a preacher for a congregation.

* You do not waste your time quarreling over insignificant things. Huge amounts of time, energy and resources can be consumed on conflicts about as important as the Lilliputian’ s battle over which end of the egg is best for breaking.

* You do not provide a forum to every penny-wit that wishes to challenge you. Left unnoticed, many of the church’s agitators soon vanish in the sun. Given a platform they flourish like a weed.

* You do not stop to defend yourself against the charges of small minded people who have nothing better to do than to criticize those who are doing something.

* You have learned that, generally speaking, it is better to stay and build up a flourishing church than to move frequently in hope of finding one.

* You have learned that it is impossible to please all the people all of the time. So you remind yourself that your first duty is to please God. Do that, act responsibly, be cordial towards all and accept the fact that still some will take exception to your labors.

* You have learned that exciting fads come and go in the church as in the world. Thus you are slow to embrace every new faddish approach that comes along. By the time you have given serious thought to it, it may well have run its course and been replaced by another fad.

* You come to appreciate the history of the church and the lives and labors of those who went before you. You now realize that if it had not been for them you may not have even known the gospel, or at least would have had a much more difficult field to plow.

* You have learned to appreciate the wisdom of older folks, especially those who are elders of the church. You marvel how much elders have improved since your earlier years.

* You come to treasure the value of friendship and brotherhood with fellow-Christians and especially faithful gospel preachers.

* You come to appreciate how much wisdom those old-time preachers had and enjoy going back and re-reading their biographies and sermons.

* You learn that a small congregation may have more to offer you than a large one. Among those blessing might be appreciation, genuine friendship, fellowship and loyalty

* Having devoted your life to building up the kingdom of Christ you have great resentment when you see a generation of men who have little or no respect for the church and take liberties with her worship and doctrine. They are destroying that which you have labored to build up.

-John Waddey

Revival gospel meeting in Lanao province

In News on April 1, 2009 at 7:30 pm

In a text message recently forwarded to us by Ferdinand Guillermo, he reports that a revival gospel meeting is scheduled on April 16-18. This will be held at Kilikili, Wao, Lanao province. #

News bits from around the Philippines

In News on March 31, 2009 at 2:42 pm

SOUTHERN MINDANAO BIBLE COLLEGE GRADUATION
Brother Dencio Solis (PBC ATh graduate) reports that the Southern Mindanao Bible College alumni will have a homecoming on April 3-4 at the college campus which adjoins the Le Reve Resort in Makilala, Cotabato.

Brother Ferdinand Guillermo (PBC ATh graduate), currently Director of the Southern Mindanao Bible College, reports that 14 students will be certified as graduates in the April 5 graduation program in Makilala. Coinciding with the graduation program, congregations in Cotabato and Davao come together for joint worship and fellowship to witness the graduation and certification of young people who come from nearby local churches.

PHILIPPINE BIBLE COLLEGE
In Baguio City, 10 young people were awarded the Associate in Theology certificate at Philippine Bible College. Brother Eliseo Tangunan (ATh ‘82) was after-dinner speaker in the graduation banquet at the Hotel Veniz in the downtown area.

PHILIPPINE THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE
Brethren Rogelio Bernardo and Ruben Mendoza (PBC BTh graduates) teach at the Philippine Theological College now operating in its new campus at Bugallon, Pangasinan. Graduation day is April 4. Carl Walker, president of the college is currently visitng in Pangasinan.

EASTERN PANGASINAN CHURCHES FELLOWSHIP
Twelve congregations in Eastern Pangasinan sent representatives to the 2009 first quarter fellowship held last March 29th at the Sobol Elementary School auditorium in Sobol, Asingan, Pangasinan. Brethren Solomon Devera and Eusebio Tanicala were the guests speakers (PBC ATh & BTh graduates respectively) . Jhun Libag (PBC ATh graduate) helps minister in this congregation in Sobol.

ILOCANDIA CHURCHES FELLOWSHIP
Congregations in Northern Luzon will send representatives on April 8-10 to participate in the “Panagkakadua 2009″ (Fellowship 2009) in Baguio City. Speakers and lecturers include several PBC alumni like Ephraim de Castro, Sammy Nisperos, Jun Patricio, Roger Nonog, John Quiniones, Teofilo Alcayde, and Eusebio Tanicala.

Ken Wilkey, Bob Buchanan and Felix Bravo, all former directors of PBC are also assigned topics to discuss.

ILOCO MAGAZINE ‘SADIRI’ STAFF MEETING
Staff members of the Iloco magazine “Sadiri” will meet in the afternoon of April 8 in Baguio City to map out strategies for the paper to continue on serving the Ilocandia congregations. Staff members are mostly PBC alumni like Roger Nonog, Nic Graneta, Jovencio Gundayao, Rolly Nonog, Adolfo Braga, Samson Nisperos, and Eusebio Tanicala among others.

MANNA CORPORATION
Investors and incorporators of the Manna Company will meet in the afternoon of April 10th. The assembly will determine whether to continue operation or not.

PBCAA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Philippine Bible College Alumni Association (PBCAA) members will hold the annual general assembly in the morning of April 11th, Saturday, in Baguio. Alumni and immediate family members are encourage to enrol and be covered by the group insurance arranged for with the Malayan Insurance Company.

“Form of God” — “Form of a Servant” (Phil. 2:6-7)

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on March 31, 2009 at 2:26 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

There’s a faulty premising done by some preachers in analyzing Christ’s deity in Philippians 2:6-7. This faulty line of reasoning goes like this in a mock interpellation:

  1. When Christ was in the form of a servant, was He truly a servant? (The expected answer is “Yes, He was a servant)
  2. When Christ was in the form of God, was He truly God? (The expected answer is “Yes.” Of course the one who doesn’t believe in the deity of Christ will quibble at this point).
  3. Conclusion: If Christ was truly a servant when he was in the form of a servant, then he was truly God when he was in the form of God.

But if I were asked the first question above, I would answer: “Form of a servant is not the same as servant.” This answer would block the progression of the interpellation. And I would add that the “form of God” is not the same as “God.”

This article explains the phrase “form of a servant” and “form of God.”

Firstly, in talking about Christ being God or deity, we mean possession of the essence or substance of deity or God. But the phrase “form of God” is different from “essence of God. “Form” refers to detachable or emptiable characteristics while “essence” or “substance” refer to undetachable attributes.From Phil. 2, we understand that Christ emptied Himself of that “form of God” which means that it is not talking about the “essence of God.”

“Form” in the context of Phil. 2:6-7 points to the honor, majesty and glittering splendor of the King of Kings in his royal palace. But a king could suspend or detach from himself the pomp and glitter of royalty and put on the humble appearance and clothing of an ordinary subject. Such is the story of Oedipus Rex in Greek mythology. Oedipus as an infant was abandoned by King Laius and Queen Jocasta of the city state of Thebes. Oedipus was picked up and raised by the king of Corinth. Many years passed and King Laius took off his crown and royal garment. He went hunting without his bodyguards. Now a young man, Oedipus was determined to search for his parents. Along a narrow path Laius and Oedipus met. Each felt royal blood running in his veins. Each presumed the other party to be an ordinary subject.

A duel ensued and the older one lost his life. Oedipus journeyed on and reached Thebes. Not knowing each other, Oedipus became greatly attracted to the widow Queen Jocasta and the two married. Years passed. Eventually the puzzle on the disappearance of King Laius led Oedipus to conclude that the man he killed on the narrow path was his own father. Filled with remorse that he killed his own father and married his own mother, Oedipus blinded himself and went into exile.

The point of the story here is that the glitter and majesty of royalty as in the case of King Laius and King Oedipus, could be set aside. But the essence of their humanity could not be discarded. King or beggar or greasy man, a human being remains human. Humanity is his essence. Once human, always a human.

Christ did an emptying act. He put aside the glitter of the King of Kings and became an ordinary, drab, rural Galilean. He had no photogenic features nor macho appeal. He was despised and rejected. See Isaiah 53:1-3. But Christ didn’t stop being God. He couldn’t discard his deity. Deity is His essence.

Secondly, “form of a servant” tells of appearances to or reputation in the estimation of others. It doesn’t point to essence of humanity. Servanthood is service and humility. Service and humility don’t empty a man of his humanity. Being a king, becoming a general or a manager, a driver, carpenter, farmer, carwasher, janitor, waiter, slave, prostitute – everyone remains equally human. A king could abdicate or be deposed. A general would eventually retire and become an ordinary citizen. But each remains human.

Servanthood was taken up by Christ. Servant of God in the salvation of mankind from the ruin of sin. Servant of humanity in suffering and dying in behalf of humanity. Servanthood was not inherent in the person and existence of Christ. It is not His essence. Christ, in the likeness of man, suffered and died to pay the penalty of sin. He fulfilled the demands of divine justice. The first Adam rebelled while the second Adam suffered the penalty. That was Christ’s servanthood.

After accomplishing His mission of paying the penalty for human rebellion, Christ emptied Himself of the form of a servant. Christ ascended back to heaven and took back upon Himself the privileges, splendor, and glitter of royalty. He sat at the right hand of God in the heavens. See. John 17:5; Rev. 1:9-20; 7:9-17.

Thirdly, since the first premise is based on the phrase “form of a servant” the focus is on the term form; consequently the second premise uses the term “form” in the phrase “form of God.” If the meaning of the first premise is admitted (that is “form of servant” means essence of a servant), then it follows that “form of God” means the essence of God. But the argument in the first premise is denied, hence the argument on the second premise is also denied.

Conclusion: Since “form of a servant” does not mean “essence of a servant” it follows that “form of God” doesn’t mean “essence of God.” Which means that Philippians 2:6-7 is not a direct proof that Christ possesses the essence of deity. Rather it is an indirect evidence of His deity.

Wrong Interpretation of Philippians 2:6-7 Analyzed

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on March 30, 2009 at 3:19 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

Some Bible students, including several from Churches of Christ, interpret the phrase “form of God” to mean one and the same thing as “essence of God.” This is a wrong interpretation. I appeal that you rethink your position on this matter.

These same students further believe that the phrase “but emptied himself” to mean that Christ emptied himself of his “essence of God” or laid aside his Deity. This interpretation is wrong. I appeal that this position should be re-evaluated.

The above ideas are promoted by said Bible students and yet they believe at the same time that Christ possessed the essence of deity or was true God while He was on earth from his birth in Bethlehem until his death at the cross. In effect they are saying that Christ emptied himself of his deity but at the same time argue that Christ is full of deity. Such statement is simply contradictory. And some don’t see nor feel their obvious contradiction.

The right interpretation is to believe in the following items:

  1. “Form of God” is not the same as the “essence of God” as much as a billowing smoke is not the same as the “flame of fire.” But the billowing smoke is a proof or effect of a big flame of fire. Only a person who has the essence of God can be in the form of God.
  2. God cannot stop being God because God cannot cease to exist. He is eternal.
  3. “Form of God” therefore refers to attributes of deity that are detachable or  characteristics that could be suspended or switched off, diminished or intensified.  God used to walk with Adam and Eve at the Garden of Eden which suggest that God could associate with humans in a pleasant, mellow presence as if walking in the park. God  appeared to Abraham as an ordinary human in Genesis 18-19. God appeared to Moses  in a burning bush and later as a thundering flame of fire in the giving of the Ten Commandments. And as a consuming fire in the case of Nadab and Abihu and in the  contest on Mt. Carmel. As a rock in the wilderness according to 1 Cor. 10:4.
  4. Don’t stick to the phrase “but emptied himself” of the American Standard Version but  compare the rendition of the King James Version or New King James Version which reads “but he made himself of no reputation.” It is reputation, esteem, respect, and glorious appearance in the eyes of mankind. This idea agrees with John 17:5 and  Philippians 2:9-11 – speaking of glorious presence and elevated honor before as well as after tabernacling with humankind on earth for 33 years.

Metrowide Youth Camping

In Announcements, News on March 26, 2009 at 7:29 pm

The Kalookan City congregation that meets at the Morning Breeze Subdivision is hosting the Youth Camping for the National Capital Region young people of the church. This will be held at the Falcon Resort in Norzagaray, Bulacan during the so-called Holy Week in April. The camping theme is “Today’s Youth, Tomorrow’s Leaders.” #

Eastern Pangasinan churches fellowship

In News on March 25, 2009 at 7:30 pm

March 29th is the first quarter fellowship of Churches of Christ congregations in the eastern part of Pangasinan province. This will be hosted by the congregation that meets in Barangay Sobol, Asingan town. A delegation from various congregations usually attend. Sometimes the whole congregation agree to attend this fellowship when held in another locality. Brother Jun Libag ministers to this church in Sobol. Invited speakers in this particular affair are brethren Mon Devera and Eusebio Tanicala. #

Prison Ministry is alive

In News on March 25, 2009 at 7:28 pm

Churches in Metro Manila and Cavite have worked together in the jail ministry at the National Bilibid Prisons since 1988. Brother Anthony Mejia of the Salawag church was recently added as a volunteer religious worker in this ministry. He is now officially recognized and certified by the prisons authorities to minister to the inmates’ religious welfare. #

Iloco magazine staffers to meet in April

In Announcements, News on March 23, 2009 at 7:27 pm

Staff members and writers of the Iloco magazine “Sadiri” will meet in the afternoon of April 8 to evaluate plans and strategies on how to continue with this quarterly paper. It serves the edification needs of Iloco speaking congregations in Northern Luzon. Eusebio Tanicala and Roger Nonog serve as editor and managing editor respectively. Joven Gundayao is the finance officer. #

PBC Graduates 2009

In News on March 23, 2009 at 3:29 pm

To: PBC alumni
From: Eusebio Tanicala, PBCAA president

As president of the Philippine Bible College Association, I shall have the privilege to induct the following candidates for the certificate of Associate in Theology into our association in the evening of March 27th during the graduation rites at 18 Rimando Road, Baguio:

1. Romiel M. Bernardo of Pozorrubio, Pangasinan
2. Edith B. Cristal of Lalanera, Nueva Ecija
3. Mamberto R. Duque of Borongan, Eastern Samar
4. Kimberly Ann L. de Guzman of San Jose City, Nue va Ecija
5. Herald H. Fuentes of San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
6. Floren Joy V. Guira of Palimbang, Sultan Kudarat
7. Geoffrey F. Lopez of San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
8. Rey Allan B. Magpantay of San Emilio, Ilocos Sur
9. Seth A. Octobre of Bontoc, Southern Leyte
10. Samuel B. Pan-oy of Tabuk City, Kalinga

Brother Felix Bravo will the commencement exercises while brother Eliseo A. Tangunan will serve as after-dinner speaker at the graduation banquet.

Leadership Extension class at SMBC in June

In Announcements, News on March 21, 2009 at 7:26 pm

In the first week of June, the Leadership Extension class which usually is organized by Bob Buchanan will be conducted at the facilities of the Southern Mindanao Bible College in Makilala, Cotabato. This forthcoming event will be held the first week of June. #

Monthly evangelistic campaign in Cotabato

In News on March 21, 2009 at 7:26 pm

Preachers and church leaders in Cotabato have agreed to saturate at least one Barangay or one locality one Saturday each month. In March the locality identified for “gospel saturation” is Barangay Bagong Tapay in M’lang town of Cotabato. Brother Ferdz Guillermo of Kidapawan City, Cotabato further informs us that the Mindanao Wide Youth Fellowship that usually brings together no less than 500 young people every year will be held from April 9 to the 12th. #

14 to graduate from SMBC

In Announcements, News on March 20, 2009 at 7:25 pm

A report from brother Ferdinand Guillermo, current director of the Southern Mindanao Bible College which is located in Makilala, Cotabato,, says that 14 are expected to be certified and to receive the certificate Associate in Theology. Date of graduation is April 5. This graduation affair serves as a reason for members of several congregations to gather together at the Le Reve Resort which adjoins the SMBC compound. Students come from congregations in the Davao and Cotabato provinces. This preacher training school is directed by the church that meets at downtown Kabacan, Cotabato. #

Monthly scheduled door knocking continues

In News on March 19, 2009 at 7:25 pm

Several preachers in the Metropolitan Manila area keep alive the monthly door knocking activity in sharing the gospel of Christ in neighborhoods near existing congregations. Last February 14th, this was done in the Payatas district of Quezon City which area is served by brother Conrado Mapalo.

During the second Saturday schedule, the preachers knock at doors at morning time to pick up prospects for Bible Study. They have lunch together. In the afternoon, they share their door knocking experiences, talk about the radio program, jail ministry and other church projects like youth camping. #

Radio broadcasting goes on

In Announcements, News on March 18, 2009 at 7:24 pm

“Si Jesus ang Daan” is aired every Sunday 3-4pm over DWSS, 1494 khz. Brethren Erwin Ocampo and Jun Patricio are the regular speakers. Some preachers from MetroManila and Cavite also prepare some lessons. Local churches contribute to the funding of this radio program. There are listeners who are interested in the lessons. Please tell your relatives to listen to this program which could reach even some towns outside of the metropolis. #

Philippine International Bible Institute—Batangas

In Announcements, News on March 17, 2009 at 7:21 pm

There are ten students currently enrolled in this preacher training school in Batangas. It is affiliated with the Sunset International Bible Institute in Texas. Brother Moises Gonzales supervises the weekend preaching of the students in five churches nearby. Three of these churches have been planted in the past several years according to a report given to us by Jun Patricio. #

Conversions in the Cagayan Valley

In Announcements, Baptisms, News on March 16, 2009 at 7:31 pm

Preachers and church leaders continue to share the gospel to our people. On March 4 three inmates in the Quirino provincial jail in Cabarroguis town surrendered their lives after several weeks of gospel lessons with brethren Banaga, Tangunan and Mercado. Baptized were R. Sumalbag, J. Rivera and R. Ignacio who are serving terms in the provincial prison house. Brother Rudy Mercado and Edward Tangunan conduct classes every Wednesday in this provincial jail.

In the third week of February Mario Bolesa and Ed Tangunan fully taught Mr/Mrs. Pepito Bolesa. Wife and husband decided to obey Christ in water baptism on Febuary 24th.

During the last week of February while brethren Mercado, Concepcion, Lumandaz, Bagachon, Bolesa, Tangunan and others were repairing the chapel in Potia during day time, they preached at night time. After several nights of teaching, four young people were baptized. In the first Sunday of February, brother Eusebio Tanicala visited and preached at Potia, Ifugao. #

PBC Alumni General Assembly

In Announcements, News on March 16, 2009 at 7:19 pm

April 11, Saturday (8am to 12noon) is the annual General Assembly of the Philippine Bible College alumni association general assembly. It will be held at the PBC library. There will be a brief devotional service which will be followed by the alumni president’s report, the treasurer’s report and a business meeting.

Emptying in Philippians 2: 5-11 Is Illustrated in Daniel 4:1-37

In Announcements, Features, Views on March 15, 2009 at 7:34 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

In my reflection of King Nebuchadnezzar’s story in Daniel 4, I find the section as an excellent illustration of the emptying which was done by Christ in the epic of redemption. A study of Daniel 4 will increase one’s deeper analysis of Philippians 2:1-11 about Christ having emptied himself of His “form of God” yet he remained fully God.

Some explain “”who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equalaity with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men,” (6-7, KJV) to mean that Christ emptied or discarded Himself of the essence of deity. Some take this position and yet they are very aggressive in their affirmation that Christ was God during the 33 years he was on earth. The two positions would be contradictory.

In a previous article, we explained that “form of God” does not mean “essence of God.” We have explained that “form of God” are the detachable-restorable characteristics; while the phrase “essence of God” compose the inherent attributes of deity that could not be emptied of. Humanity is the essence of being man. A man could not stop being human. Deity is the essence of God. God could not stop being God.

King Nebuchadnezzar was the greatest and most splendored king of the powerful Babylonian Empire. The king had a splendid palace (v.30), a tall, towering dominion (vs. 10-12), he was a powerful despot (vs. 20-22), with honor, splendor and majesty (vs. 30,36); surrounded and adored by a fawning retinue of counselors and nobles. But Yahweh humbled this King-god Nebuchadnezzar From a pedestal that was attended by royal splendor, despotic power, and honor, the king was brought down to a level below the normal human subsistence. Down to the level of beast: human reason lost (v. 36), possessed heart of a beast, ate grass like a beast, naked as a beast, tied down as a ferocious beast, hair unwashed/untrimmed that hardened like eagle’s feathers and nails that grew and sharpened like bird’s claws (vs. 23, 25, 32, 33).

From the form of a clean, glittering, majestic, godlike, powerful, adorable, royal personality, King Nebuchadnezzar took another form: he became a dirty, greasy, dull, lowly, beastly, powerless, demented person. His characteristics are that which are lower than the normal beast. He was a demonized-beast. But he remained human. The essence of humanity remained intact in him. The externals of royalty were, however, discarded or emptied of for a season (possibly 7 years). Then after a given period of time, the detachable attributes of kingship were restored back to him (v. 36).

A similar story is found in the case of our Lord Jesus Christ. From the unfathomable eternal past, long before the invisible powers, thrones, authorities and dominions of angelic hosts were created (Col. 1:15-17) Christ has existed as a spirit persona. He has been existing as the Second Person in the Godhead Trinity. Christ created the angelic hosts. He was worshipped by angels. See Deut. 32:43; Psalm 97:7. Brightness and intense light surrounded the dwelling of the Godhead. It is suggestive of celestial royalty. God shines brighter than the intensity of one thousand exploding atomic bombs which the naked eye could not behold onto. See Daniel 2:22; Psalms 4:6; 44:3; Hab. 3:4; Matt. 17:2; Rev. 1:16.

Before the creation of the visible universe, Christ had heavenly glory says John 17:5. Christ had riches far greater in value and volume than all the wealth of the whole world multiplied a hundredfold says 2 Cor. 8:9. Angels served Him says Psalms 91:11, 12; Matt. 4:6. But Christ emptied Himself of these detachable royal attributes of glory, honor, majesty, and splendor befitting a King. However, His essence, his reality as Deity was not detached from His person when he was commissioned to take the form of a servant as described in Phil. 2:5-8. It is therefore wrong to say that the meaning of “He emptied Himself” means He emptied Himself of the essential attributes of God.

The New King James Version renders v. 7 this way: “but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a servant and coming in the likeness of man.” At the margin it reads, “emptied himself of His privileges.” The translators of the NKJV understood that the “emptying” is not discarding his deity. Rather, the emptying refers to the suspension of privileges and glorious appearances. But when he ascended back to heaven all these were restored back says Phil. 2:11 and Rev. 1:9-20; Rev. 7:9-17.

This period of emptiednness for King Nebuchadnezzar of his royal splendor and privileges was possibly 7 years while that of Christ was 33 years. (Comments or critiques are welcome.)

Makati City church founding anniversary

In Announcements, News on March 15, 2009 at 7:23 pm

Brother Chito Cusi of Cebu City was the guest speaker in the March 8 first anniversary celebration of the Makati City congregation (formally called Metro South Church of Christ). This new congregation is led by a group of young professionals and businessmen. An intern from the Church Planting Institute operating in Tagaytay City is currently serving this new congregation. Two interns from Philippine Bible College in Baguio and Sunrise Christian College are expected to augment the evangelistic thrust in this area of the big Metropolitan Manila area. #

Church Institute dedicates building

In Announcements, News on March 15, 2009 at 7:21 pm

The Church Planting Institute building in Tagaytay City was inaugurated and dedicated last March 5. This new building was put up through the donation of a couple who loves the Lord. The two choose to remain anonymous. This institute is dedicated to the training of church planters.

Brother Jun Patricio, one of the instructors in this school, would like to encourage matured Christians to enroll in the training. Students will be encouraged to go into church planting campaigns. #

North Luzon Lectureship in Baguio

In Announcements, News on March 15, 2009 at 7:18 pm

April 8-10 is the date for the fellowship-lectureship of northern Luzon congregations which will be held at the 18 Rimando Road compound. Hosting this affair is the Baguio Church. Expected attendance is may reach 1000. The theme is on the authority of Jesus Christ.

To speak on special topics are Bob Buchanan (The Doctrine of Fellowship & Disfellowship); Ken Wilkey (The Appointment of Elders & Deacons); Eusebio Tanicala (The Instrumental Music Issue).

Textual lessons will discussed by Felix Bravo (Mtt. 5:22 & 26); Jun Patricio (Mtt. 5:28 & 32; Roger Nonog (Mtt. 5:44); Arnold Zambrano & Em de Castro & Sam Nisperos (Mtt. 6:2,5,16 in separate classes); John Quiniones, Arnan Bayla, Sam Nisperos (Mtt. 6:25 & 29 in separate classes). #

Gospel campaigns scheduled in Isabela and Quirino

In Announcements, News on March 11, 2009 at 7:27 pm

Brother Edward Tangunan says that gospel campaigns are scheduled in several localities in the Cagayan Valley: Potia, Ifugao on March 23-26; Aglipay, Quirino province on March 27; Leadership class in Saguday, Quirino province on March 28-29; Villacampo, Echague, Isabela on March 30-31; San Mateo, Isabela on April 1-3. Brethren Ken Wilkey, Eusebio Tanicala, and Dick Baguioen will join Isabela and Quirino preachers and church leaders in this ten-day evangelistic campaign. #

A Sinner’s Prayer

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on March 7, 2009 at 5:30 am

Several years ago, while I was waiting for my turn into the doctor’s office in Baguio City, a visiting medical intern sat by me and we talked about salvation through the Lord Jesus Christ. This medical intern told me that it was easy to accept Jesus Christ into one’s life. She invited me to pray with her and she opened her notebook and read a paragraph of supplication for the forgiveness of sin and told me to believe in Jesus. Then she declared: “You are now saved.”

I told the young medical intern: “That’s not the process that our Bible tells us.” And she went away. My name was called and I went into the doctor’s office.

In connection with the Baguio City Flower Festival, a religious worker during the first week of March this year distributed religious tracts along Session Road. I was given this small tract which contains the following:

“God is good. He loves you! Welcome to the Panagbenga City on its Centennial Year. The Love of God is so great that He gave Himself for us. He speaks to us in so many ways and everything that happens to us is known to Him. Make this event special for you and God by accepting this gift of Salvation through Jesus Christ. (Acts 4:12) For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Rom.3:23). Do not miss this chance, Jesus is knocking at the door of your heart and He wants to come into your life. (Rev. 3:20)

SAMPLE PRAYER: Lord Jesus, forgive me for my sins and cleanse my heart from every sin. Come into my heart and take control of my life. Thank you.

Then believe God’s promise that He has cleansed your heart from all your sins and has given you Eternal Life. (Jn 1:12; 1 Jn. 5:11-13).”

The religious group in which the tract distributor belongs to has invented the “Sinner’s Prayer” process and it eliminates water baptism.  This religious group considers baptism a non-essential action.  But being baptized in water is a COMMAND AND REQUIREMENT given by Jesus Christ. Being baptized in water is a believing and repentant sinner’s physical drama of the gospel: Christ’s death, Christ’s burial, Christ’s resurrection. See 1 Cor. 15:1-5.

Being baptized is a believer’s drama; it is an act of incorporating oneself into the authority domain of the Godhead; the Apostle Peter says it is for the forgiveness of sins; it is an act that incorporates a repentant sinner into the death of Christ; it is an act that incorporates a repentant sinner into the resurrection of Christ; it is an act of the believing sinner as a means of putting on Christ giving the image of a white robe washed by the blood of Christ; it is an answer of a clear conscience. See Mark 16:15-16; Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 2:38; Romans 6:1-6; Gal. 3:27; 1 Peter 3:20-21.

Our Lord Jesus Christ warned us of some blind teachers leading blind followers. A “Sample Prayer” is popularized by some religious teachers and yet they vehemently reject water baptism which is mentioned so many times in the New Testament. Let’s be careful on what we believe and follow.  – Eusebio Tanicala

The deity and humanity of Christ

In Features, Views on March 6, 2009 at 3:26 pm

If Jesus Christ were deity (God) why is it that …..

  1. He didn’t know the day when the world would end as read in Matt. 24:36?
  2. He was born of the Virgin Mary and wrapped in swaddling cloths?
  3. He cried when He was brought to his friend Lazarus’s tomb?
  4. He slept and became thirsty?
  5. He bled and died at the cross on Calvary?
  6. He said that the Father is greater than He is in John 10:28?
  7. He increased in wisdom and physical size says Luke 2:51?

The above items belong to the humanity of Jesus Christ and not to His deity. But these don’t necessarily exclude another nature of our Lord.

To shift the burden of proof, on those who claim that the Lord Jesus is man (human) only there are also some questions they ought to answer.

If Jesus Christ were man (human) only why is it that :

  1. He was at the Father’s side before the creation of the world as read in John 17:5?
  2. By Him all things in heaven were created as read in Col. 1:16?
  3. By Him all things on earth were created as read in Col. 1:16?
  4. By Him all things invisible (thrones, dominions, principalities, powers) were created as read in Col. 1:16?
  5. He existed before the world was created says Col. 1:17?
  6. He existed before Adam the first man was created says Col.1:17?
  7. According to John the Baptist who is older said that Jesus existed before John the Baptist was born says John 1:30?
  8. According to John 3:13, Jesus while alive and talking to Nicodemus, He has ascended to heaven before He descended to earth?
  9. According John 6:33, 38, 50, 51 & 58 He came down from heaven before He died and ascended back to heaven?
  10. According to John 8:58 Jesus declared that He existed before Abraham was born?

The above items should point to the deity (God nature) of Jesus Christ.

In clarifying the meaning of Matt. 24:36, we should not think of the nature or essence of Christ as “either He is man only OR deity (God) only.” It’s like you asking me this question: “Is your brother in Honolulu a Filipino citizen OR an American citizen?” I would tell you that your question is wrong because my brother is BOTH a Filipino citizen and an American citizen. This is called “dual citizenship.”

In relation to citizenship we ask the question: “Can an American citizen privately own a pice of land in the Philippines?” No. But my brother owns a 150 square meter lot in Metro Manila. Who then owns that small piece of land? Is it my American citizen brother? No. It is my Filipno citizen brother who owns it.

Likewise, the question about the nature of Jesus Christ our Lord should not be “Is He man only or deity (God) only?” He is both Man and deity. He has dual nature.

Who then didn’t know the end of the world? Obviously Christ’s was pointing to his humanity as the one not knowing the day and hour of the end of the world. Going back to Luke 2:51, who is the Jesus that increased in wisdom? It refers to Jesus’ humanity. Who increased in physical size? Obviously, it refers to Jesus’ humanity.
I hope that this article with the illustrations is of help to Bible students.

The Presence and Indwelling of the Holy Spirit

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on March 4, 2009 at 3:38 pm

(Series #02-09)

By Eusebio Tanicala

This year, I’ve written one article about the presence of the Holy Spirit. I’ve suggest that dividing into segments or epochs the time span of human awareness and Bible history might help clarify the issues under study. By reflecting on the Godhead (the Holy Spirit included) within the separate spheres of the different epochs we would have a wider sphere of understanding beyond the syntax and grammar of New Testament passages.

The main proposition that some Bible students affirm in this study is: “That the Holy Spirit indwells (influences, guides) the Christian through the mediation of the word (Bible) only.”

In a question form these same group asks: “What can the Holy Spirit do that the word can’t do?”

The proposition above means that the Holy Spirit (in effect God or deity) influences or guides Christians (in effect the whole cosmos) through the word only. This idea I deny.

The question above means that what the Holy Spirit can do, the word of God in the Bible can also do. In view of this belief they hold, there’s no need to call for the personal influence or guidance of the Holy Spirit because the inspired word has been delivered to mankind. This idea I also deny.

In the first article I wrote this year, we limited our thoughts within the period when what was in existence was deity or God. This Epoch #A covers from the unfathomable eternal past up to the point when spiritual dominions and powers or angelic hosts were created.

Within this period, several questions come out which we must seriously consider:

  1. During this period of Epoch #A, when what only existed is Deity or God, how big was God and what corner and point in cosmic space and in the heavens was God not found?
  2. During this period of Epoch #A, did the three persons of the Godhead communicate through the words written in the Bible or through telepathy?
  3. During this period of Epoch #A, the three persons of the Godhead were in complete harmony and complete unity, is it not true that where the Father was, the Second Person was also there and the Third Person was also there?
  4. During this period of Epoch #A, did the Holy Spirit influence or guide without the word or the Bible?
  5. The Holy Spirit existed during the period covered by Epoch #A and the Holy Spirit has mind today to go back into that epoch, did the Bible exist during that period of Epoch A and does the Bible possess mind that could go back and remember that period before the creation of the angelic hosts?

Your answers to the five questions above will make clear your position on the proposition and question submitted above.

It is clear that long before humanity was created and long before the Bible was written and long before God spoke anything in the physical universe as recorded in Genesis 1, God has acted and willed of His own. That means that God existed and willed of His own before anything was spoken in Genesis 1:1. Which means that Deity or God exists and wills beyond and outside of the oral or written word of the Bible. It means that God or the Godhead (Holy Spirit included) exists and wills beyond and outside the oral or written word of the Bible.#

(Note: A sequel to this article is forthcoming. ET)

Graduation in Bible Colleges

In Announcements, News on March 3, 2009 at 3:37 pm

Philippine Bible College in Baguio expects to graduate ten students on March 27th according to brother Cristino Sacayanan; and according to brother Ferdinand Guillermo, the Southern Mindanao Bible College in Makilala, Cotabato will certify fourteen students on April 4th. We hope that these number will be added to the rank of preaching brethren.

Potia, Ifugao Chapel update

In News on March 3, 2009 at 3:36 pm

In the last week of February, the group of brethren Rudy Mercado, Mario Bolesa, Ruben Bangachon, Regie Valdez, Rey Banaga, Rex Concepcion, Rod Lumandaz, Mariano Ragus, Edward Tangunan, four newly baptized young people of Potia worked and finished rebuilding the chapel in Potia, Alfonso Lista, Ifugao.

Brethren Dick Baguioen and Eusebio Tanicala including those meeting in San Mateo, Isabela and Aguinldo, Ramon, Isabela contributed in purchasing materials.

King Solomon’s Gold Collection Roughly Estimated in Volume

In Bible Study Lessons, Features on February 27, 2009 at 11:25 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

The Philippine Bible Society wants to make the present generation feel the weight and volumes that are used in olden times by employing currently understood measures. There are several places in the Bible where wealth is expressed in “talents.” However, many Bible students think that “talent” is ability. But “talent” is a weight measure. And there is the “long” or “royal” talent which was about double the “short” or “ordinary” talent.

In the later Philippine dialect translations, the Philippine Bible Society instructed tribal linguists to use the metric weight measure. Instead of “talent” the weight measure of “ton” is used.

In this article, the writer endeavors to roughly calculate the gold and silver collections of King Solomon by using the record of the Iloco Bible where “ton” is employed. A metric ton is 1000 kilograms (kilos). A kilogram is 2.20 ounces (oz.)

If some are interested to make monetary computations, the price of gold in the world market in the third week of February 2009 was more than $1000 per ounce. This report was made by Reuters correspondents from New York and London which appeared in the Business Section of The Philippine Star (Feb. 22): “Gold rose above $1000 an ounce on Friday for the first time since March last year as nervous investors piled into the yellow metal to preserve wealth amid a tumbling stock market.”

Now let’s notice passages where Solomon’s gold and silver are mentioned. “The king made silver and gold as common in Jerusalem as stones.” (see 2 Chron. 1:16 & 1 Kings 10:27) Indeed, Solomon’s time was the golden era of Israel. I may have missed other verses where gold and silver are recorded that were owned by Solomon. But the following will suffice to demonstrate the great collection of the Rich Man.

a) 1 Chron. 22:14- Gold stockpiled by David was 4,000 tons = 4,000,000 kilos = 8,800,000 ounces.
b) 1 Chron.22:14 -King David’s silver was 40,000 tons = 40,000,000 kilos = 88,000,000 ounces.
c) 1 Chron.29:4 -Finest gold from David was 115 tons = 115,000 kilos = 583,000 ounces.
d) 1 Chron. 29:4 -Pure silver from King David was 265 tons = 265,000 kilos = 418,000 ounces.
e) 1 Chron.29:7-Gold from officials was 190 tons or 190,000 kilos or 418 ounces.
f) 1 Chron.29:7- Silver from officers was 380 tons or 380,000 kilos or 836,000 ounces.
g) 1 Kings 10:22- Gold and silver every three year voyage of commercial ships. Solomon ruled forty years so that allows about 12 voyages. If the gold-silver volume is approximately that of 1 Kings 9:28 of 16 tons x 12 = 192 tons or 192,000 kilos or 422,400 ounces.
h) 1 Kings 9:11, 14- Gold was 5 tons or 5,000 kilos = 11,000 ounces.
i) 1 Kings 9:28- Gold was 16 tons or 16,000 kilos=35,200 ounces.
j) 1 Kings 10:10- Gold was 5 tones or 5,000 kilos or 11,000 ounces.
k) 1 Kings 10:14- Gold was 25 tons yearly for 40 years = 1000 tons = 1,000,000 kilos or 220,000,000 ounces.
l) 1 Kings 10:15- Granting that 25 tons of gold come from other sources annually x 40 year reign = 1000 tons = 1,000,000 kilos or 20,000,000 ounces.
m) 1 Kings 10:22- Granting that we have 16 tons as in 1 Kings 9:28 from this source, this is 16,000 kilos or 35,200 ounces.

The above is the best estimate I could make from my reading of the accounts in the historical books. I hope that this will make you feel how wealthy Solomon was, however, the verdict on this Rich Man is found in 1 Kings 11:9, “So the LORD became angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned from the LORD God of Israel, who appeared to him twice.” #

Eugene Awingan, Sr. buried Friday morning

In News, Transition on February 26, 2009 at 11:25 pm

According to text reports, the remains of brother Eugene Awingan, Sr. will leave his residence at 9:30 in the morning of Friday after the necrological service has been done.  A good number of preachers and church leaders have visited the remains during the one week vigil at Beverly Hills Subdivison in Cauayan City, Isabela.

Potia, Ifugao chapel rebuilt

In Baptisms, News on February 26, 2009 at 11:24 pm

Several church leaders in Isabela and Ifugao joined hands this month of February in rebuilding the chapel at Potia, Alfonso Lista, Ifugao. Brethren Rudy Mercado, Mario and Edward Tangunan, among others, labored several days to make the hall a respectable place to study the Bible and hold congregational worship. While the group labored at day time at the building, they also preached the gospel at night time. On February 24th four young men were fully taught and dramatized the gospel of Christ in water baptism at a nearby river.

Eastern Pangasinan churches fellowship

In News on February 26, 2009 at 11:22 pm

Congregations in the eastern portion of Pangasinan will hold their quarterly fellowship and joint worship on the 29th of March, according to a report received from Jun Libag. This affair will be held in Sobol, Asingan, Pangasinan.

The Law of Specifity and The Law of Exclusion among Churches of Christ

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on February 18, 2009 at 5:22 am

By Eusebio Tanicala

The Law of Specifity supports the rule of “Go Back to the Bible” and the Restoration Movement’s slogan, “Speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent.” The “Law of Specifity” means that what is specified is what the Lawgiver wants to be followed. To subtract from it, or to add to it or to substitute it with another item insults the Lawgiver especially if the Lawgiver is the Creator God, the all-wise God, the all-knowing God, the all-powerful God, the God who is the Judge of the Universe.

Related to this law is The Law of Exclusion which means that what is specified necessarily excludes any other item in the same category. When the Philippine constitution specifies that a President, a Vice President and 24 senators are the national government officials to be elected, the specific law necessarily excludes electing a King or electing a Queen.

The Law of Specifity and the Law of Exclusion are based on the axiom of logic which states: Expresso unius excluso alterius. Roughly translated it reads, “That which is expressed excludes any alteration.”

Among mainstream Churches of Christ, building Noah’s ark is a good example in biblical interpretation. We submit that the gopher wood material is specific and to substitute it with another kind of wood would have been unacceptable. The boat’s measurement was specified. To change the dimension would have been unacceptable. The Book of Leviticus specifies several kinds of sacrifices and offerings. Altering the specified kind of animals and altering the prescribed offering procedures would have been unacceptable. Do you think any Hebrew or priest had the audacity to change what Yahweh prescribed? Did not the prophet Malachi condemn the priests who did not follow the prescriptions about the tithes? An expressed prohibitory statement is not needed to define limitations.

Among Churches of Christ, the specified basis for divorce is fornication in Matthew 19:3-12. There’s general agreement that what is specified remains the exclusive basis for scriptural divorce. An expressed prohibitory statement saying, “Snoring during sleep shall not be a basis for divorce” is not needed.

Among Churches of Christ, the specified elements of the Lord’s Supper are bread and fruit of the vine. We oppose the Roman Catholic Church’s decision of withholding the cup from the people because such doctrine destroys the authority of Christ. All serious Bible students oppose the introduction of fried chicken, lechon, pizza, bibingka, pineapple juice in the Lord’s Supper because we all believe that what is specified would exclude other items in the same category.

Among Churches of Christ, we believe that Ephesians 5:18-19 “singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;” Colossians 3:16 “singing with grace in your heart to the Lord;” Hebrew 2:12 “in the midst of the congregation will I praise your name;” and James 5:13 “Is any cheerful? Let him sing praise” (ASV quotations) specify the instrument in making the music of Christian worship: the heart or the spiritual person. Adding the mechanical instrument of music we abhor because we believe in the validity of The Law of Specifity and The Law of Exclusion.

When we in the Churches of Christ interpret the woman’s veil or else her head be shorn in 1 Cor. 11:4-6, we should be consistent in the application of The Law of Specifity and The Law of Exclusion. During the time of the Apostle Paul, the two areas or two activities that were specified when a woman should wear veil are “praying” or “prophesying.” But among Churches of Christ there are five identified worship activities: Praying, Singing, Listening to the Exhortation (Sermon-Bible Exposition), Participating in the Lord’s Supper, Collecting contribution from the members.

To be consistent in applying the two laws cited above, we should agree that there were only two areas when a woman in Paul’s time was to wear veil: when praying or prophesying. Not in other activities.

Also to be consistent in applying the two laws cited above, we should recognize that the specific voice of the two verbs “praying” or “prophesying” is in the active voice. Meaning, a woman had to actually do the act of “praying” or “prophesying” to feel obligated to wear the veil.

To require a woman to veil herself while she listens to the lesson presented by a male teacher during the Bible Study hour or during the sermon which is delivered by a male preacher is to violate the two Laws cited above. To require a woman to veil herself in other areas of church worship would be violative of 1 Cor. 4:6 warning in “not to go beyond what is written” or Revelations’ warning not to add to nor subtract from what is written.

The appeal here is to observe the two Laws cited above or else there would be no limitations in religious activities. Also observe consistency in the application of hermeneutical dogmas so that what is applicable in one area should also be applicable in other areas given the same situation.

(In another article we shall explain that the acts of “praying” or prophesying” among women have expired with the cessation of the miraculous and direct operation of the Holy Spirit in distribution spiritual gifts)

Some Questions on I Corinthians 11:1-16 about Veiling

In Features, Views on February 16, 2009 at 6:18 pm

During my trip to the Cagayan Valley in the first week of February this year, I was asked some questions about the woman’s veil or the woman’s head being shorn. I would like to share with you my reflections on 1 Cor. 11:1-16. Perhaps presenting the issues in question form would be helpful.

Questions #1: How many interpretations have Bible students arrived at about the woman’s veil or woman’s head being shorn?

Answer: There are several major conclusions arrived at which are the following: (a) All females attending church services should be veiled or else her head is shorn from the moment they step into the assembly hall until the end of the worship service including the Bible Study hour applicable from the first century up to the end of the world as a sign of subordination of females to male headship; (b) Veiling or head being shorn was a cultural tradition in the first century in the Bible lands to show female subordination to male headship when a woman goes out of the house including attendance in church services but it is not applicable in the Philippines; (c) The long hair in verse 15 is the veil in verses 5-6; and (d) There are two acts or periods specified in the text when a female who is Holy Spirit inspired which are “praying” or “prophesying” which acts were public and leadership roles in the first century during which a woman should wear a veil or else her head be shorn, however, Holy Spirit direct inspiration ceased by the end of the first century, therefore no female in the 21st century leads in “praying” or “prophesying” among Churches of Christ hence there is no basis for requiring a symbol of female subordination today.

Question #2: In your opinion, which among the four points of view is most consistent or correct?

Answer: I believe that position #4 above is most consistent or correct.

Question #3: Were there women who “prayed” or “prophesied” during the time of the Apostle Paul in the first century of the Christian era?

Answer: Yes, there were or else the Apostle would have not given the instruction. Prophesying by women was foretold in Joel 2:28-31; its fulfillment is recognized in Acts 2:16-21; and actually done according to Acts 21:8-9.

Question #4: Was the act of “praying” or “prophesying” in the contemplation of 1 Cor. 11:5-6 a public and leadership role for women?

Answer: Yes, both actions were leadership roles whether done by male or female. Leadership role is inherent in the term “prophesying.” A prophet, when inspired by God or by the Holy Spirit would stand up in public and proclaimed or expounded God’s message. It follows that in the context of 1 Cor. 11, “praying” is also a leadership role or a public act or church assembly act.

Question #5: What is the significance of the active voice of the verbs “praying” or “prophesying”?

Answer: The active voice of the verbs “praying” or “prophesying” is very significant as much as the passive voice of the verb “”be baptized” in Acts 2:38 and 22:16. The active voice demands that the subject person actually does the act of the verb. The verbs actually done by the woman subject is “praying” or “prophesying.” A woman should actually do the act when she is required to put on the veil or else be shorn. If she does not do either act, she is not required to put on the veil or is not told to be shorn.

The passive voice of the verb in Acts 2:38 and 22:16 demands that the subject person should have somebody to baptize him. The subject person does a disobedient act if he himself baptizes himself. Likewise, a woman does a disobedient act if she wears the veil when she is not praying or prophesying.

Question #6: Veiling advocates believe that Christian women should be veiled or else her head be shorn throughout the period of the assembly including the Bible Study hour, is this correct?

Answer: The passage is very clear that there are only two acts or periods when veiling or head be shorn is required: (a) when a woman actually “prays,” or (b) when a woman actually “prophesies.”

Question #7: What is wrong if a woman veils even when she’s not “praying” or “prophesying”?

Answer: Veiling or having the head shorn when not in the act of “praying” or “prophesying” is wrong because the specified acts when the veil is required are listed: praying or prophesying. To wear the veil or have the head shorn during other acts that are not specified would be going beyond what is written as read in 1 Cor. 4:6 and it is an addition according to Rev. 22:18-20. We apply the Law of Specificity or Law of Exclusivity when we analyze Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16 about the instrument used. Heart is specified instrument so it excludes mechanical instruments. We should apply these hermeneutical axioms in 1 Cor. 11:5-6 to be consistent.

Question #8: Do women members do the act of “praying” or “prophesying” as contemplated in 1 Cor. 11:5-6 when they are silent and seated during the Bible Study hour which is facilitated by a male teacher?

Answer: No, they are not praying or prophesying during the Bible Study hour so they should not wear the veil nor have their heads shorn. Their being seated and listening shows their subordination to male headship. Double subordination is not contemplated in the text.

Question #9: Do Churches of Christ women in the 21st century do the act of “praying” or “prophesying” when they are silent and seated during the sermon which is delivered by a male preacher?

Answer: No, they are not “praying” or “prophesying” as contemplated in 1 Cor. 11:5-6 during the sermon delivery period because they are seated and they intently listen. During the sermon period, women are not commanded to wear veil or their head shorn. Being seated and listening intently are actions of women that show their subordination so there’s no need for the symbol of subordination.

Question #10: How do we know that there is no more direct Holy Spirit inspiration among Churches of Christ women in the 21st century?

Answer: Prophesying was one of the miraculous and spiritual gifts of the Holy Spirit in the first century. See Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. Also the lexicons of Liddell and Scott, Arndt and Gingrich, and Louw-Nida. It is the general belief of Churches of Christ that the miraculous spiritual gifts of the Holy Spirit have ceased by the year 100 A.D. This view is based on 1 Cor. 13:8-11. No new message, no new instruction, is given to female members today. No Holy Spirit inspired prayer or empowerment is given today among women. When the NT or the gospel was fully revealed and generally understood by the first century churches, the miraculous HS operation ceased.

Question #11: The woman’s veil or having the head shorn is required “because of the angels” says v. 10, is the presence of angels sufficient ground to require a woman to wear her veil today?

Answer: Sound biblical hermeneutics tells us that verse 10 should not be taken apart from the context of verses 1-16. The main lesson in this section is the recognition of a hierarchy of authority which is God down to Christ down to the male and down to the female. We in the Churches of Christ recognize this hierarchy of authority by invoking 1 Cor. 14:33-35 and 1 Tim. 2:8-11. A woman who did the leadership role of standing up to pronounce a new message of God or expounded God’s message or instruction before the congregation in the first century when she was moved by the Holy Spirit invaded the male domain of authority. While she invaded the authority domain, she was made herself equal to male leaders, but even if she was occupied the teaching authority of man during the prophesying period, she could declare subordination to man’s authority by putting on her veil or else be shorn. But since no woman in the Churches of Christ stands up today to prophesy or lead prayers, she does not need to show a symbol of subordination. Her silence while she’s seated and allowing male leaders to teach and lead prayers and lead songs are in themselves declarations of subordination. When a woman openly declares her subordination by her silence and being seated, there is no need to make a double declaration of subordination by wearing the veil which is a symbol of subordination.

Matthew 18:10 tells us of angels who continuously keep an eye on believers; Hebrews 1:14 tells of angels who minister to those who are interested in salvation. I’d venture to say that angels are interested in our salvation and would become unhappy when we disobey. A woman who was moved by the Holy Spirit in the first century ventured into the male authority domain so she was required to wear the veil to declare her recognition of male leadership. Failure to declare her recognition of male leadership by putting on her veil while she stood up before the congregation to expound a new message or instruction while inspired by the Holy Spirit would be a form of disobedience and would have made the angels unhappy. Angels who went beyond the boundary set by God were rebellious and were sentence with a heavy penalty. A woman who does not recognize the headship of male leaders would commit the same rebellion as the angels in Jude 6 who didn’t keep the God-defined sphere. Or we could venture to the idea that angels would report such disobedience to the Supreme God.

Question 12: Is it correct to say that the covering in v. 15 is the same as the veil in vs. 5-6?

Answer: This view seems very unnatural in a literary point of view. The apostle argues strongly for an artificial covering for women from verse 4 down to 14. To cancel the argument for an artificial covering in verse 15 is simply against literary logic and common sense. Culturally, this point of view is also incorrect because historians and Bible scholars testify that Greek women during the apostolic period put on the material covering when they went out to the market or to the public assembly including religious activities. Textually, the two should be different because the veil in verse 5-7 is from the Greek katakalupto and katakaluptomai while the word “covering” in verse 15 is from the Greek word peribolaiou.

Question 13: What is the significance of mentioning the long hair in v. 15 as a covering in relation to the Material veil in verses 4-7?

Answer: I think that the apostle, in citing the long hair as being naturally and culturally beautiful for women, wanted to heighten his strong argument for the artificial veil as a symbol of a woman’s subordination of male headship. That if the long hair of a woman is naturally and culturally beautiful, it would also be beautiful and pleasing in the sight of God and in the eyes of the angels if a woman put on the symbol of subordination while she is the process of intruding inside the authority domain of the male leaders in the acts of praying or prophesying. The woman’s intrusion into the male authority domain while praying or prophesying as empowered by the Holy Spirit would not be an illegal or rebellious act if she declared her subordination by wearing an artificial veil or else have her hair be shorn. (Eusebio Tanicala)

JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES USE WRONG ARGUMENTS

In News on February 14, 2009 at 3:33 am

The people of the Watchtower Society of New York want to insist that the scriptural name for servants of God is “Jehovah’s Witnesses.” This claim is false when the following reasons are carefully evaluated:

  1. A great majority of Bible scholars and theology professors as well as Bible translators now agree that the best translation of the tetragrammaton YHWH is Yahweh and NOT Jehovah. Even the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ magazine “Watchtower” recognizes and accepts that Yahweh is the nearest if not the exact rendition of the tetragrammaton and NOT Jehovah.
  2. For more than 50 years, the first name used by these Watchtower friends was “International Bible Students” but in a convention during the second decade of the 20th century (1900s) the new name they wanted to wear became “Jehovah’s Witnesses.” The change of name reveals that the Watchtower prophet was not Holy Spirit-inspired in choosing the right name in the period of 1844 to 1846 in America.
  3. When the Septuagint (Greek translation from the Hebrew text) was made in Egypt some 350 years before the birth of Christ, the tetragrammaton YHWH was translated KURIOS in the Greek Bible. It was not rendered Jehovah.
  4. When our Lord Jesus Christ quoted from the Septuagint Bible while He was on earth, He it appears that He used the Greek word KURIOS and not Jehovah.
  5. When the Holy Spirit inspired the New Testament writers like Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, James and Jude all of them used the Greek word KURIOS in translating or referring to the tetragrammaton YHWH. Not Jehovah.
  6. The Greek word KURIOS and its derivatives are translated in many English Versions as LORD (capital letters). Other versions now use Yahweh as in the latest Iloco and Tagalog editions put out by the Philippine Bible Society. The Jehovah rendition has been discarded because it is now recognized as a mistranslation or mis-vowelled.

I hope that this article could be of help. – Eusebio Tanicala

WEAK ARGUMENT – “God is a man of war”

In Features, Views on February 13, 2009 at 4:25 pm

Since 1960 I’ve heard several students using the expression “God is a man of war” (Exodus 15:3) to counter the claim of people who teach that “God is not man.”

The expression “man of war” in Exodus 15 means that God is a warrior, or that God fights and destroys armies. It doesn’t mean that the Godhead is human.

“Man of war” may also refer to a warship and doesn’t refer to the humanity of a certain type of battleship.

I strongly appeal to Bible College teachers to stop using this Exodus 15 passage to contradict the INC proof text “God is not a man that He should lie.” The two passages don’t contradict each other if properly interpreted.

There are many proofs that Christ is deity. Don’t use weak arguments because those who reject Christ’s deity will only laugh at opponents who use wrong arguments. And wrong or weak arguments will only make the opposing side stick to their original ideas if what they hear are the weak or falso arguments. – E.Tanicala

WEAK ARGUMENT – CONJUNCTION “AND”

In Bible Study Lessons, Features, Views on February 12, 2009 at 4:24 pm

I have heard a fellow preacher use in a public debate the conjunction “and” found in John 17:3 as proof in arguing for the deity of Christ. His line of reasoning is “that the conjunction ‘and’ connects two terms of equal rank.” He explained that thee are two persons named in the passage: the Father and Jesus Christ; that the Father is true God and it follows that the Son is also true God because the two are jointly mentioned and are connected by the conjunction “and.”

The explanation of our fellow preacher is confusing and is weak. First, the grammatical rule of the conjunction “and” refers to connecting or joining two “clauses of equal rank.” The conjunction “and” is used to connect or join two independent clauses. The two clauses should be both independent clauses, the same rank as clauses. This conjunction “and” should not be used to connect an independent clause to a dependent clause.

The “equal rank” refers to the rank of the clause. Not the rank or position or title or office or honor held by a persona.

I strongly appeal to Bible College teachers and older preachers to stop the above argument based on John 17:3 using the conjunction “and” as proof of Christ’s deity.
The argument is wrong. – E. Tanicala

13 Steps to a Better Understanding Why the Use of Mechanical Instruments of Music in Christian Worship Lacks New Testament Authority

In Bible Study Lessons, Features on January 29, 2009 at 5:35 am

Step #1. Know that Amos 5:21-23 and Amos 6:3-7 Don’t Prohibit the Use of Musical Instruments among the Israelites

a) Previous generations were taught that these passages are the most direct and most potent argument against the use of mechanical instruments, but proper interpretation tells us that prohibition of musical instruments is not the message of the Book of Amos. A false argument proves nothing.

b) Amos condemned the injustice and lack of faith in Yahweh that prevailed in the nation in the midst of external religious activities which showed the hypocrisy of the Israelites. It’s the same hypocrisy in Isaiah 1 and Matthew 23.

c) Amos 5:23 negates singing as well as stringed instruments, but why prohibit only the latter? To condemn musical instruments based on this passage automatically condemns singing.

Step #2. Know that King David Was not the First to Use (discover and originate) Musical Instruments
a) “Invent” (chasab in Heb) in Amos 6:5 means “to design” (Young’s Analytical Concordance, page 519) just as architects today design houses but they don’t discover and bring out for the first time the use of houses.

b) Genesis 4:21 tells us that the first users of harps and flutes were Jubal and his sons who lived thousands of years before David became king in the year 1010 B.C.

c) Jacob went to Haran in the year 1929 B.C. and his father-in-law already chanted songs to the sound of timbrel and harp. See Gen. 31:27. Miriam, Moses’ sister, and the Israelite women, danced to the sound of instruments after the miraculous crossing of the Red Sea which happened about 500 years before David was born. See Genesis 15.

d) All of the above prove that King David didn’t originate the use of musical instruments in worship.

Step #3. Know that the Use of Musical Instruments in Israel’s Religious Activities during the Mosaical Dispensation Was Commanded by Yahweh the True God

a) The priests, thro Moses, were commanded to make trumpets for religious services. See Num. 29:1-6; Lev.23:23-25; 25:29.

b) King David’s producing instruments of music for the tabernacle worship was a command of Yahweh, the true God, through the palace prophets Nathan and Gad. See 2 Chronicles 29:25.

c) Read 2 Chronicles 30:1-27. Specifically v. 21, “…the Levites and the priests praised the LORD day by day, singing to the LORD, accompanied by loud instruments.” And v. 27, “The priests, the Levites, arose and blessed the people, and their voice was heard; and their prayer came up to His holy dwelling place, to heaven.” These passages tell us that during the Mosaical dispensation, God accepted mechanical instruments in worship and praise.

d) In view of the above, it is wrong to claim that musical instruments in worship is sinful from the very beginning of time.

Step #4. Know the Attributes of the God We Worship to Create in Us Awe, deep Respect, godly Fear, and Obedience

a) God is the Creator and maintainer of the Universe

b) God is immense, awesome, glorious, majestic, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient.

c) God is Judge at the last day when all men give account of their obedience or disobedience.

d) Capture the worshipful attitude of those surrounding the throne of God in the Book of Revelation.

e) Honor, respect, be in awe, and pay reverence to the God we serve.

f) Observe decorum and protocol in your worship of God for He demands such in John 4:24.

Step #5. Know that there Are Three Dispensations with Different Modes of Worship

a) Patriarchal: worship was mainly through burnt animal sacrifices on stone altars and by prayers.

b) Mosaical: worship acts are defined in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers & Deuteronomy.

c) Christian: worship was defined by Christ in John 4:24 in a general sense and the specifics are found in the gospels and New Testament books. There’s no mention of mechanical instruments of music in the church worship in apostolic times.

Step #6. Know the Evolution of the Synagogue Worship which provided the Background for many Church’s Practices

a) During the United Kingdom, the center of worship was the Tabernacle with animal offerings mediated by the priests and the giving the tithes of farm produce, the weekly Sabbath rest of staying in their abodes plus the annual feasts; during the Divided Kingdom, the center of worship was the temple

b) During the Captivity Period and after, worship evolved: Weekly gathering in local places called the synagogue; Scripture reading in the synagogue; Exhortation or sermon; Reading of Doxologies; Prayers, and Singing. Mechanical instruments of music were not employed in the synagogue worship. You may check these up in Edersheim’s book, “Life and Times of Jesus Christ.”

Step #7. Know the New Testament Passages that Specify the Kind of Music Stated for the Church

James 5:13; Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16; 1 Cor. 14:15 Romans 15:9; Hebrews 2:12. There’s no generic term “make music to the Lord” but the specific act in the NT is “vocal music” which sing with your heart.

Step #8. Know the New Testament Greek Lexical Meaning of the Word Psallo & Psalmos

a) Notice the evolution of the verb psallo which has its root from psao which meant “to rub, to wipe; to handle, to touch” without music attached to the word. Note the different stages and changes of meaning of the word: (Stage 1) “To pluck off; to pull out.” Note that music is still out of the meaning. (Stage 2) “to cause to vibrate by touching, to twang, to touch or to strike the chord, to twang the strings of musical instruments so that they gently vibrate” Note that vibration, an association with pleasing sound now comes out. (Stage 3) “to play on a stringed instrument, to play the harp.” Note that the meaning is entirely on the music produced by the physical instrument and singing is excluded. (Stage 4) “To sing to the music of the harp” Note that the two acts go together at this stage: vocal and instrumental. (Stage 5) “In the N.T. to sing a hymn, to celebrate the praises of God in song, James 5:13 (R.V. sing praise; … in honor of God, Eph. 5:19 (here A.V. making melody); Romans 15:9, psallo to pneumatic, psalo de kai to noi – I will sing God’s praises indeed with my whole soul stirred and borne away by the Holy Spirit, but I will also follow reason as my guide, so that what I sing may be understood alike by myself and by the listeners, 1 Cor. 14:15.” Note: The mechanical instrument is now dropped off from the meaning at this stage; singing became the only activity meant in the word. (See Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon, page 675)
b) Psalmos, meant “a striking, twanging , specifically a striking the chords of a musical instrument; hence a pious song, a psalm, Ephesians 5:19; Col. 3:16.” (See Thayer’s Lexicon, same page) Note that the “musical instrument” is not material, but the heart because the meaning now is simply “a pious song, a psalm.”

My explanation: Since the direct object of the action verb mentioned in Eph. 5:19 & Col. 3:16 is the heart, the musical instrument is the human heart; not any mechanical instrument like organ, guitar or trumpet. The longing of the human heart is expressed by singing, the fruit of the lips.

Step #9. Know the Typology of the Bible that Points to an Evolution from the Physical to the Spiritual Realm

Hebrews 10:1-3 teaches us the existence of shadows or types or representations and the antitypes or realities. The Mosaical Law was a teacher that led the Jews to Christ’s Law, the New Testament, which means there’s a change. Note some of the shadows and their realities:

a) OT Passover was a lamb or a goat, but NT Passover is Christ.

b) Day of Atonement to bring away Israel’s sins was a escape goat, but NT escape goat is Christ.

c) OT high priest came from Aaron’s family, but NT high priest is Christ from the tribe of Judah.

d) OT temple was a physical building, but NT temple is the church and individual bodies.

e) Israel’s goal was to reach the promised land of Canaan, but NT goal is heaven.

f) OT music included material musical instruments; but NT specifies the heart/lips.

g) To include in the NT worship the mechanical music maker of the OT is the same as going back to the OT Passover lamb, OT escape goat, OT high priest, OT temple, etc.

Step #10. Know the Early Historical Testimonies on Church Music

You may refer to the two articles of our brother Jack P. Lewis “Music and the Church Fathers” page 14 and “Music in Worship During the Reformation” page 16 of TRUTH FOR TODAY, March 2008. He quotes from historical books which give evidence that vocal music was the practice of early centuries. See also Marshall Clement Kurfees’ book “Instrumental Music in the Worship” and Guy Caskey’s booklet on the same subject.

Step #11. Know how to Use the Authority Diagram to Determine Biblical Acceptance

This is exemplified by J.D. Thomas’ diagram.

Step #12. Know how to Explain the Law of Specifics and Law of Exclusion on Religious Matters

a) The Law of Specifics could be stated like this: “Where an item of faith or religious practice is specifically authorized in a NT passage and no other item of the same level in the NT amends it in another passage, the specified item becomes exclusive. Example: Issue on divorce in Matt. 19:1-10. Are we free to add any other grounds?

b) Examples: (1) Mark 16:15-16 state that belief and baptism are items related to forgiveness of sins; but Acts 2:38 amends and adds repentance; Acts 22:16 further adds “calling on his name” as another item on the same level; therefore, all these should be taken together as acts required by God for the forgiveness of an alien sinner. On the other hand (2) Christ is mentioned as the “only begotten Son of God” – since there’s no one else mentioned in the NT as begotten Son of God, Christ remains to be believed as the exclusive Son of God and nobody else.

c) This is the case of “Singing” as the specified music in the church that becomes exclusive.

Step #13. Know the Danger of the expression “Anything not expressly prohibited in the New Testament, that thing is allowed.”

a) This statement would give liberty to every Bible teacher and religious leader to introduce any kind of belief and practice that is not expressly prohibited in the New Testament. Following have no expressed prohibition in the NT: Withholding the cup from the laity in RCC Lord’s Supper; canonized saints serving as mediators; the Pope as head of a universal church; the pope as the vicar of Christ on earth; Purgatory as an intermediate state of the dead; Limbo as an intermediate state of innocent dead children but non-Roman Catholics call these beliefs as errors because they are not found in the NT. Also claiming Muhammad as the last prophet, believing in Felix Manalo as the last messenger of God,
allowing Joseph Smith to add to the Bible the Book of Mormon as a basis of religious beliefs are not acceptable because they are not found in the Bible. Sprinkling as a form of baptism, having a special priesthood in the church, having cardinals as officers of the church are digressions because these are not in the NT.

b) What forbids me as a religious leader to add the following items to the Lord’s Supper observance: pizza, coke in can for each participant, fried chicken, etc.?

c) The above expression destroys the basic presumption of the Reformation Movement: “Sola Scriptura” and also contradicts the starting principle of the Restoration Movement: “Speak where the Bible speaks; be silent where the Bible is silent.”

d) Further, it destroys the authority of Christ recorded in John 12:42-50; 1 Cor. 4:6-7; Matt. 7:21-23.

e) Therefore, the expression “Anything not expressly prohibited in the New Testament, that thing is allowed” is dangerous and should be avoided as a principle in Biblical Interpretation.

(Note: I will give a more detailed discussion during the Northern Luzon Churches of Christ fellowship on April 10, 2009 in Baguio City.)

North Luzon Fellowship Schedule

In News on January 23, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Here are the topics and lecturers for the 2009 North Luzon Churches of Christ Fellowship which will be held in Baguio City from April 8-10, 2009

Textual studies by

  • Felix Bravo on Matthew 5:22 & 26
  • Arnold Zambrano, Ephraim de Castro, Sam Nisperos and M. Weygan on Matt. 6:2, 5&16 in various classes;
  • Jun Patricio on Matt. 5:28 & 32
  • Roger Nonog on Matt. 5:44
  • John Quiniones, Arnan Bayla, Sam Nisperos on Matt. 6:25 & 29 in various classes.

Special topics will be discussed by

  • Ken Wilkey on the “Appointment of Elders & Deacons;”
  • Bob Buchanan on “The Doctrine of Fellowship & Disfellowship;”
  • Eusebio Tanicala on “Instrumental Music Issue.”

The authority of Christ serves as a background of the theme “But I Say This to You.”

Elders of the host Baguio Church of Christ are Alex Ciencia, Ray Locaberte and Cris Sacayanan.

PBCAA Annual General Assembly

In Announcements, News on January 21, 2009 at 4:41 pm

As approved by the Board of Trustees of the Philippine Bible College Alumni Association, board chair and president Eusebio Tanicala wishes to announce that the general assembly required by the by-laws of the association will be held at the library of Philippine Bible College on April 11 (a Saturday) from 8:00 to 11:00AM. PBC alumni are requested to attend the meeting.

Bible Camp for MetroManila Youth Scheduled for April

In Announcements on January 20, 2009 at 3:56 pm

The Kalookan City congregation that meets at 74 Asuncion Street, Morning Breeze Subdivision, Kalookan City will play host to the Metro Manila Youth Camping 2009 during the so-called Holy Week. Maundy Thursday and Good Friday will be April 9 and April 10 respectively. This annual affair will be conducted at the Falcon Crest Resort at Norzagaray, Bulacan.

Congregation Started in Mountain Province

In Announcements, Baptisms, News, church planting on January 19, 2009 at 4:41 pm

Brother Emilio Panday reports that three souls were baptized on December 17th bringing the membership of a new congregation to six. Michael Gomez stayed behind a few days in Natonin, Mountain Province to assist the new congregation in holding their first worship service and to give more Bible lessons to the new converts.

New Congregation Planted in Zambales

In Baptisms, News, Photos on January 19, 2009 at 4:38 pm

A report sent in by Eden Moral-Tulan tells of the baptism of a family composed of Ed, Berna, Jennifer and Phoenix Langaman this January in San Antonio, Zambales. These will form the nucleus of a new congregation in the town of San Marcelino. The four were baptized by Rodrigo Moral, Jr., a fieldworker from the preacher training school in Angeles City, Pampanga last January 2.

Phoenix (14)
From Word Ministry

Jennifer (16)

From Word Ministry

Bernadette (39)

From Word Ministry

WRONG PREACHERS’ ARGUMENTS VERSUS JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES

In Bible Study Lessons, Features on January 9, 2009 at 4:13 pm

By Eusebio Tanicala

Since 1960 when I first attended classes at Philippine Bible College, I have heard students and preachers using the argument that “a witness is one who has personally seen somebody or personally heard something that he testifies about.” Evidently the students and young preachers of that period have invented this superficial definition of the term “witness” which they employed in discussions against the Jehovah’s Witnesses. I have never accepted that superficial definition of the term “witness.”

Many of our preachers when confronting “Jehovah’s Witnesses” ask the question: “A witness is one who has seen something or somebody, have you ever personally seen Jehovah that you witness for Him?”

After almost fifty years, the above ignorantly framed and wrongly premised question is still used by some preachers. Because I feel that the argument or question framed is wrong, I write this article so that educated Jehovah’s Witnesses won’t sneer at our preachers. And I hope our preachers would stop using wrong arguments.

Lately, a preacher excitedly related to me how he silenced a group of “Jehovah’s Witnesses.” He told me that he asked the question: “A witness is one who has seen what he testifies about, have you ever seen Jehovah that you say you are a witness of Jehovah?” Since the group did not answer him back, our preacher felt he had silenced these people. He felt victorious.

Question: Is it true that the term “witness” necessarily refer to one who has personally seen the one he witness about?
Answer: No, it is not true that a “witness” is one who has seen the person he bears testimony of or gives witness about.

The Old English form of the word is “witness” which meant knowledge or testimony. And in the Old English language a person who has knowledge or testimony was called a witnesser. So the argument that a witness should have personally seen or has personally heard of that which he testifies of is not correct. In view of this, I appeal to my preaching brethren to stop using a wrong definition and wrong argument.

Funk & Wagnall’s Standard Dictionary, Vol. 2, page 1446 says about the term witness, “1. A person who has seen or knows something; 2. In law, one who has knowledge of facts relating to a given cause and is subpoenaed to testify.” I challenge doubters to check up with knowledgeable lawyers how they define the term witness. Ask them if seeing is an essential requisite of one to be a witness.

From the dictionary definition, one could witness based on his knowledge. Witnessing is not based only on the act of seeing.

In the Bible the term witness may mean testimony or one who gives a testimony. It may mean martyr or one who is passionate about a cause or an idea. Many of the passages in the New Testament that are translated “witness” come from the Greek words or derivatives of martus, marturia, and marturion. Please check up your Strong Bible Concordance on page 1064.

Now I submit passages (NKJV) where the term “witness” are found which refer to inanimate objects or no-person entities. Such passages tell us that “seeing” is not always the basis of true witnessing.

  • Genesis 21:30 says that seven ewe lambs are called witnesses
  • Genesis 31:44 points to a covenant as a witness; 31:48, 52 point to a heap of stones as a witness
  • Deut. 4:26 says that heaven and earth are witnesses
  • Deut 31:19 & 21 a song serves as a witness
  • Joshua 22:26,27 & 34 tell us that an altar is a witness
  • Job 16:8-9 points to a shriveled face as a witness.
  • Our Lord says in Matt. 24:14 that the gospel after it has been preached into all the world would be a witness to the coming of the end of the world
  • John 5:36 & 10:35 record that works are called witnesses
  • James 5:3 tells us that rust or corrosion of metal money is also called a witness
  • Conscience is called a witness in Romans 9:1.

The above verses should be sufficient to prove that a “witness” is not necessarily one who has seen somebody or something.

Brethren, the strength of one’s argument should be based on the truth and correctness of one’s premises and not based on the ignorance of the unschooled rural Jehovah’s Witnesses. Let us not bluff the ignorant people by our ignorance.

THE PERSON, MISSION and MEDIUM OF THE HOLY SPIRIT VIEWED IN VARIOUS BIBLICAL PERIODS (Series ‘09—01)

In News on January 7, 2009 at 3:18 pm

Eusebio Tanicala, Ph.D.

Before some people would declare me a “false teacher” for not agreeing with them on their view on how the Holy Spirit works, I would like to make known my position based on my understanding of the Bible. If my views in this series of articles will be questionable to anyone, I would appreciate receiving any scriptural explanation to the contrary. Or better still we could arrange for a personal conference.

One time I was asked what my position is about the “indwelling of the Holy Spirit.” I told the brother that it would help clarify the issues if we begin from the very basic ideas and from the very ancient epochs and not merely dwell on the syntax and grammar of some scriptures.

VIEWS FROM SECTORS OF THE RESTORATION MOVEMENT

From the Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement (403ff, 2004) there are four positions that have crystallized. We list them down.

A. “Verbal-restrictive (or verbal-intensive) position which holds that the work of the Holy Spirit is wholly immanent in the Word of Scripture – that is, that the Holy Spirit operates on the human heart mediately through fact and arguments drawn from the Bible.”

B. “Verbal-augmentative position, according to which the Holy Spirit invests the written and spoken Word with special powers beyond the text itself, a power especially suited to teach the human soul.”

C. “Verbal-coefficient position. In this view the Holy Spirit accompanies the preaching of the written Word, the Spirit and the Word, working independently of each other but in harmony. This view both saves the real presence of the Holy Spirit as a Person distinct from any fallible verbal presentation of the truth and prevents a conception of the written Word from being some kind of fourth presentation of the Godhead, a divine power-in-itself.”

D. “Verbal-transcendent (or Spirit-intensive) view … the general notion is that the Holy Spirit can and sometimes does act apart from the Word and immediately on the heart of the unbeliever who, while he or she believes the gospel, cannot will to change his or her life without a special spiritual impulsion.”

FOY E. WALLACE, JR’S VIEW

In their efforts to check “Pentecostalism movement” in the 1960s, some brethren took the position that the Holy Spirit indwells or influences people through the truth contained in the written/oral word only, the Bible. I believe that the late brother Foy E. Wallace, Jr. fairly represented the position of this group in his booklet “The Mission & Medium of the Holy Spirit.” This group takes “Verbal-restrictive” position as described above. And this is the view of some quarters that would like to declare me and those who are like me as “false teachers.”

Here is one paragraph from Foy Wallace’ treatise on page 7:

“That the Spirit of God enlightens and converts sinners; comforts and strengthens saints; that love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentleness, goodness, meekness, fidelity, self-control, are all the fruit of the Spirit, we learn not from inner consciousness, but from the Word of God. The modus operandi – the mode, the medium, the how – is the Word of God. ‘The Spirit of God is ever present with his truth, operating in it, and through it, and by it,’ said Alexander Campbell in the debate with Rice. This statement is incontrovertible and unassailable and covers the whole issue. Independent of the Word we could never know ‘whether there by any Holy Spirit.’ All the knowledge of God, Christ, salvation and spiritual influence comes only from the Word of God. Apart from the inspiration of the apostles and prophets it is impossible for spirit to communicate with spirit except through words. God and Christ never personally occupied anyone; and for the same reason the Holy Spirit does not personally occupy anyone.”

The above paragraph could be presented in proposition forms for easier understanding:

  1. The Spirit of God enlightens and converts the sinner; comforts and strengthens saints … the how is the Word of God.
  2. The Spirit of God is ever present with his truth, operating in it, and through it, and by it.
  3. All knowledge of God, Christ, salvation and spiritual influences comes only from the Word of God.
  4. Apart from the inspiration of the apostles and prophets it is impossible for spirit to communicate with spirit except through words.
  5. God and Christ never personally occupied anyone; and for the same reason the Holy Spirit does not personally occupy anyone.

The above views have some weaknesses. I submit my observations and ideas so that the Filipino preachers will have a more biblical stand than the above and make their argument cogent.

To help us understand better the presence and influence of the Holy Spirit, I would like to submit the first biblical period, “Epoch A – When Nothing Existed Except the Godhead” And here are some questions to reflect on to answer the inquiries about the presence and influence of the Holy Spirit.

  1. When the Godhead was the only personality that ever existed, was the Godhead with the Holy Spirit as a member present in all of cosmic space? My answer is “Yes.”
  2. During this Epoch A, was the Holy Spirit personally present in all of cosmic space? My answer is “Yes.”
  3. Dogmatic Theology says that God is omnipresent; during this Epoch A, was the Holy Spirit personally present in all of cosmic space? My answer is “Yes.”
  4. During this Epoch A period, was the presence of God the same in dimension as His dwelling? My answer is “Yes.”
  5. During this Epoch A, was there a place where God was present where the Holy Spirit was not present? My answer to this question is “None.” Where you think of God’s presence, the Holy Spirit’s presence was co-extensive.
  6. During this Epoch A when there was no Torah or Bible, did the three distinct spirit persons of the Trinity communicate with each other? My answer is “Yes, they did communicate.”
  7. During this Epoch A, did the three distinct persons of the Trinity communicate through the truth found in the words of the Bible? My answer is “No.” There was no Bible then and the mind of the three persons of the Trinity need not digest truths from written or oral words because truth inherently resides in the Godhead.

Our second issue will be “Epoch B – From the Creation of the Invisible Principalities and Powers.” This covers the period from the time the invisible powers were created until the rebellion of the Devil. Ephesians 1:21; 6:12; Romans 8:38; Colossians 2:15 speak about this period.

NATIONAL LADIES RETREAT 2009

In Announcements, News on January 6, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Bacolod City will be the venue of the annual National Laides Retreat during the last week of April. Updates of this affair shall be posted in this blog.

Holy Week 2009 Schedule

In Announcements, News on January 6, 2009 at 3:22 pm

April 9 and 10 are Maundy Thursday and Good Friday respectively this year of 2009. Regional and sectoral aftivities are lined up during this so called Holy Week in Philippine traditions.

Congregations in the Ilocandia region will converge in Baguio City. Metro Manila Youth Camping will be held in Norzagaray, Bulacan with the Kalookan City church as host and coordinator.

Churches in Central and Eastern Visayas will have their own affair. So does Western Visayas and the Western and Eastern sections of Mindanao.

NEWS Successfully Conducted

In News on January 6, 2009 at 3:20 pm

The annual National Evangelism Worskshop & Seminar which is hosted by MetroManila-Batangas-Cavite congregations was held last December 22-24 at the facilities of the Metro Manila Church at 31 Samar Avenue in Quezon City.

Kalookan City Church was the organizer and Jun Patricio was chairman. Morning devotional speakers were Alfrendo Angangan, Sr., Neph Sico and Willie Franco. Workshop facilitators were Jhun Ma and Randy Macapagal. The main topics were discussed by Reuben Emperado of Cebu City, Bob Buchanan of Davao City, Felix Bravo of Tarlac City, Johnny Eastep of Texas and Eusebio Tanicala of Baguio City.